Author Topic: Proposed change to USTA regs to limit aged horses to 35 starts/year  (Read 5500 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Liberty Bell

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1612
Re: Proposed change to USTA regs to limit aged horses to 35 starts/year
« Reply #15 on: November 15, 2024, 09:08:00 AM »
Facts:

I agree Lare is most likely still training them. To make it look good, last night 2 of his horses ran at Dover and when they returned to paddock area after the race Walter Callahan was there to greet the horse. Jaime Sullivan has been listed as trainer for several horses the past few years, mainly Frank Chick's but there's definitely a connection to Lare.

Kirby's Ace

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 4696
Re: Proposed change to USTA regs to limit aged horses to 35 starts/year
« Reply #16 on: November 15, 2024, 09:12:55 AM »
Facts:

I agree Lare is most likely still training them. To make it look good, last night 2 of his horses ran at Dover and when they returned to paddock area after the race Walter Callahan was there to greet the horse. Jaime Sullivan has been listed as trainer for several horses the past few years, mainly Frank Chick's but there's definitely a connection to Lare.

Why Walter would want to get hooked up in Lares mess is beyond me. Everyone who gets involved with Kevin winds ip getting burnt.
9/09/26 A day of celebration!

Liberty Bell

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1612
Re: Proposed change to USTA regs to limit aged horses to 35 starts/year
« Reply #17 on: November 15, 2024, 09:14:36 AM »
He owns a couple of horses and trains a few, probably needs the money.

SeattleSlew

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 699
Re: Proposed change to USTA regs to limit aged horses to 35 starts/year
« Reply #18 on: November 15, 2024, 10:18:04 PM »
More posturing by the USTA. HISA just held a major roundtable/meeting at the Breeders Cup and the topic was racehorse safety. They covered both from the sport/business perspective, and relative to public perception. Then they expanded the conversations. HISA has already had more than a hand in getting tracks to delay or cancel racing, shut down a turf course, etc.---and they've been successful in doing it, even though they don't have the enforcement authority to directly do it. That's a success.

The USTA can recommend, propose, even mandate, all they want. I am still waiting to see what authority they actually have. Like we've seen before, they are inserting themselves into issues where they were uninvited, and they have no authority. Sounds like a lot of noise to me. I think you will see more state horsemen's associations begin to act autonomously, support HISA, and begin to operate differently.

If this proposal ever goes anywhere----watch what happens when people start calling for limiting the # of starts for 2yo's. Now that will be entertaining to watch, LOL.

Actually, the proposal does have a limit for 2 yo and 3 yo; if I recall it was 20 or 25 starts for a 2 yo and 30 starts for a 3 yo and then 35 for 4 and up.

 

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • wiggles44: Good morning everyone.  It sure has been quiet the past few days here.   :)
    Today at 07:52:00 AM
  • wiggles44: You’re still here Mike?   :)
    September 25, 2026, 09:00:06 PM
  • Sweet: Maybe band everyone but R2Drew they can't handle this whole forum themsleves  ngc3
    September 25, 2026, 08:03:45 PM
  • JT: Nice SAW tmbz1
    September 25, 2026, 08:02:20 PM
  • Sweet: SAW hit the early p4 and p5 at Hick downs
    September 25, 2026, 08:01:45 PM
  • JT: Not betting, just watching..I guess 100 races wasn't enough  ngc3
    September 25, 2026, 07:59:53 PM
  • Sweet: Nice, SAW likes the 485 too  tmbz1
    September 25, 2026, 07:58:40 PM
  • JT: My brother saw her set the track record at Scioto on their sire stakes finals night..said she is a monster
    September 25, 2026, 07:54:01 PM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal