Author Topic: Proposed change to USTA regs to limit aged horses to 35 starts/year  (Read 3181 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

SeattleSlew

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
If I recall it was put forward by a group of judges who claim that more starts lead to more injuries and that this leaves horses unfit for their retirement.  This should go over like a lead balloon.

Locked in with pace

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1202
Re: Proposed change to USTA regs to limit aged horses to 35 starts/year
« Reply #1 on: November 14, 2024, 08:27:41 AM »
idiotic suggestion. Maybe restrict how fast they can go.

Ramone

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 283
Re: Proposed change to USTA regs to limit aged horses to 35 starts/year
« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2024, 12:34:17 PM »
idiotic suggestion. Maybe restrict how fast they can go.

It's a great and enduring tradition of harness racing that any effort to make life safer for horses is labelled "idiotic".

Kirby's Ace

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2880
Re: Proposed change to USTA regs to limit aged horses to 35 starts/year
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2024, 12:37:19 PM »
Limit starts on 2 yr olds! Beter yet make 3 yr olds the soonest you can start to race. Then you'll see sounder older horses.
I hunt big mouth Triggers

gh2009

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1605
Re: Proposed change to USTA regs to limit aged horses to 35 starts/year
« Reply #4 on: November 14, 2024, 01:23:09 PM »
I agree with limiting starts for 2-year-olds, but not being to start racing until you're 3 would never fly and plenty of owners would leave the game because they can't get back their investment.

I see Art Stafford Jr was able to drive his trotter Yale in a Delaware Standardbred Development race this week and is in again next week but has no other drives. Is it because it's considered a stake race where they've been paying fees along the way?
« Last Edit: November 14, 2024, 01:25:59 PM by gh2009 »

Lance

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 945
Re: Proposed change to USTA regs to limit aged horses to 35 starts/year
« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2024, 01:26:29 PM »
Nick Clegg is proposing that 2yr old only be allowed to start 42 times in a calendar year.

Brown jug

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3423
Re: Proposed change to USTA regs to limit aged horses to 35 starts/year
« Reply #6 on: November 14, 2024, 01:42:05 PM »
here's a thought
usta /acgo do some real work and catch the juicers who make horses go faster than they are capable
that's why so many breakdown

Kirby's Ace

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2880
Re: Proposed change to USTA regs to limit aged horses to 35 starts/year
« Reply #7 on: November 14, 2024, 03:17:58 PM »
I agree with limiting starts for 2-year-olds, but not being to start racing until you're 3 would never fly and plenty of owners would leave the game because they can't get back their investment.

I see Art Stafford Jr was able to drive his trotter Yale in a Delaware Standardbred Development race this week and is in again next week but has no other drives. Is it because it's considered a stake race where they've been paying fees along the way?

That would make sense regarding Stafford. Also I see Lare is gone at Dover as well.
I hunt big mouth Triggers

bello

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Proposed change to USTA regs to limit aged horses to 35 starts/year
« Reply #8 on: November 14, 2024, 03:24:35 PM »
Let em race....Just take the whip away. These old warhorses know what to do.

gh2009

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1605
Re: Proposed change to USTA regs to limit aged horses to 35 starts/year
« Reply #9 on: November 14, 2024, 03:33:46 PM »
Kirby's Ace:

You're right about Kevin Lare being gone because last week he was still listed as trainer on Primo Maschio. He's in an early non-wagering race tonight and Walter Callahan is listed as trainer. I know his son Shea was suspended for 6 months last year, it's been close to a year since and he's nowhere to be found.

bello

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Proposed change to USTA regs to limit aged horses to 35 starts/year
« Reply #10 on: November 14, 2024, 03:41:30 PM »
Kirby's Ace:

You're right about Kevin Lare being gone because last week he was still listed as trainer on Primo Maschio. He's in an early non-wagering race tonight and Walter Callahan is listed as trainer. I know his son Shea was suspended for 6 months last year, it's been close to a year since and he's nowhere to be found.

Is getting banded genetic?  How many generations is this?

gh2009

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1605
Re: Proposed change to USTA regs to limit aged horses to 35 starts/year
« Reply #11 on: November 14, 2024, 03:50:36 PM »
Hasn't been a good year for the Lare's, their father John died earlier this year and Primo Maschio just lost for the 2nd straight week, guess the Lare magic has worn off!
« Last Edit: November 14, 2024, 04:18:47 PM by gh2009 »

Dingus

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 861
Re: Proposed change to USTA regs to limit aged horses to 35 starts/year
« Reply #12 on: November 14, 2024, 04:18:57 PM »
Nick Clegg is proposing that 2yr old only be allowed to start 42 times in a calendar year.

And no more than 3 times in a week unless the driver is over 250 lbs, then 2 times in a week.

Facts

  • 4 claimer
  • **
  • Posts: 96
Re: Proposed change to USTA regs to limit aged horses to 35 starts/year
« Reply #13 on: November 15, 2024, 06:25:56 AM »
Lare may not be listed as trainer but he’s still training them horses. Walter and Jaimie just are listed on the program. It’s ridiculous

Grandstand Handicapper

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2125
  • Which wolf wins? The one you feed.
Re: Proposed change to USTA regs to limit aged horses to 35 starts/year
« Reply #14 on: November 15, 2024, 08:28:03 AM »
More posturing by the USTA. HISA just held a major roundtable/meeting at the Breeders Cup and the topic was racehorse safety. They covered both from the sport/business perspective, and relative to public perception. Then they expanded the conversations. HISA has already had more than a hand in getting tracks to delay or cancel racing, shut down a turf course, etc.---and they've been successful in doing it, even though they don't have the enforcement authority to directly do it. That's a success.

The USTA can recommend, propose, even mandate, all they want. I am still waiting to see what authority they actually have. Like we've seen before, they are inserting themselves into issues where they were uninvited, and they have no authority. Sounds like a lot of noise to me. I think you will see more state horsemen's associations begin to act autonomously, support HISA, and begin to operate differently.

If this proposal ever goes anywhere----watch what happens when people start calling for limiting the # of starts for 2yo's. Now that will be entertaining to watch, LOL.

 

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • Trigger: Whip marks, better call  Equine Advocacy Alliance, Mike will help her.  Your wife but still a beast  ngc3
    Today at 12:10:22 AM
  • Kirby's Ace: Yeah I had to take her to the hospital for the whip marks.
    Today at 12:04:34 AM
  • Trigger: Teague and Horsey gave it to her goooooood!
    Today at 12:02:53 AM
  • Trigger: No doubt wifey is the breadwinner
    Today at 12:02:20 AM
  • Kirby's Ace: HmmmNow Blacks and cum..You must be Simons brother!
    Today at 12:02:12 AM
  • Kirby's Ace: How did you like your wife giving away your Beef and Broccoli dinner to the guy she was fucking!
    Today at 12:01:19 AM
  • Trigger: Kirby stopped kissing his wife on the lips because he hates the taste of black cum
    Today at 12:01:12 AM
  • Kirby's Ace: Hey, it's her money!
    Today at 12:00:37 AM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal