I find it awfully hard to evaluate pacers off of yearling photos. It seems like a lot of the time all you can identify is if they look athletic (he does) or if they do something egregiously wrong (throw a leg; look off, etc).
If the question is would I have bought solely on video, the answer is no. But if the question is whether anything in his video would make me not buy him, the answer is also no.
My understanding was, the biggest knock on him at the sale was he was too big. Having seen him in person at 2...he is pretty damn big. But it sure hasn't hindered him much. They can be big and athletic, or big and clunky (and therefore hard on themselves). He is definitely the former.
