« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Can someone explain to me why there is no CAW betting at Yonkers ??  (Read 5973 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Grandstand Handicapper

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2715
  • Which wolf wins? The one you feed.
Re: Can someone explain to me why there is no CAW betting at Yonkers ??
« Reply #15 on: January 05, 2025, 03:26:36 PM »
An absolutely excellent question! You should make the question clear and concise----and email it to----Joe Faraldo, Brian O'Dwyer, Robert Williams, Gary Pretlow, Bill Hornbuckle, Paul Salem, Kathy Hochul, and several others. At least you will have the possibility of getting an answer based upon facts.
Logged

pocketrocketwinner

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418
Re: Can someone explain to me why there is no CAW betting at Yonkers ??
« Reply #16 on: January 05, 2025, 03:29:32 PM »
I'm aware of how long CAWS have been in existence. Early 2000s I was 100% aware of them in t-breds. I'm not saying the meadolands invented them. I'm saying they work with them to ensure handle. Everyone knew this for years and years. It took jessica otten to piss everyone off again by congratulating them a few weeks ago
Logged

PIGLAND

  • Living Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 165244
Re: Can someone explain to me why there is no CAW betting at Yonkers ??
« Reply #17 on: January 05, 2025, 07:21:04 PM »
jonkers should race for purse money only
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »
 

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • Ignorance Is Bliss: Calhoun is desperate. First his 15 year lie was busted. Now he says I hid behind a 75 year old man to take the hit? Interesting. There's actually a Livestream out there I did from home minutes after two cowards attacked Yarock over me. Calhoun also thinks Mr. Ed could speak.
    Today at 05:40:35 PM
  • Sweet: ScrapeTheShit!  ;D
    Today at 05:31:27 PM
  • Sweet: Define Chihuahua Cock  ngc3
    Today at 05:27:52 PM
  • darnoldrocks: Dougie, define humanely?
    Today at 05:20:20 PM
  • Lockedin with Pace: dougie---with some people if they know 5 positive things a person has done and one negative, they'll completely focus on the negative.
    Today at 05:18:35 PM
  • dougie: I will make another point if I may. There are multiple horse owners in this group. LUCPARK, rainman2, and so many others. many here are very successful owning horses. I and my partners were not. But I can't believe people who do well in the game and folks like me who didn't cant agree that the horses should be treated humanely. The history of Mike P. might be interesting to people. And folks on Plop might dislike him for a myriad of reasons. I know nothing about him but his advocacy. I think I can seperate the misdeeds everyone talks about from his desire to help these horses.
    Today at 05:14:54 PM
  • dougie: lumped into their misdeeds. Sorry, my typing is off today.
    Today at 04:58:08 PM
  • dougie: Calhoun, I am not surprised at anyone who doesn't share my opinion. Everyone has the right to their own point of view. As for whatever acts you mentioned=Ed that he might have committed, it should not draw away from his horses advocacy. Many folks have done lots of things wrong. But despite that, should the good things they do be li=jumped into their misdeeds? Is a person to be judgedf on their worst day or instinct? Like I mentioned before, I don't know of the man. But I have studied up on him. I cannot answer for the things you and others seem to know about him as a human being. But I will continue to support his efforts to make the treatment of horses more humane.
    Today at 04:57:14 PM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal