Author Topic: Should a Trifecta EVER Pay Less Than the Exacta?  (Read 2439 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Babinga

  • Top Claimer
  • ***
  • Posts: 128
Should a Trifecta EVER Pay Less Than the Exacta?
« on: March 17, 2024, 04:00:38 PM »
Even if the 3rd place finisher was the 9-2 third choice?  This is what happened at Saratoga last Sunday (see chart below).  I know the pools are small, separate and the numbers may matter (in this case 4-3-2) but still... The $2 Exact paid $286.50 and the $2 Trifecta paid $269.  I could see this happening legitimately if the even money #1 horse was third due to Trifecta boxes but not with the 3rd choice.  I can hear the excuse now, the Exacta just paid extremely well.  What do you think?

     

Doctor Plopenstein

  • 4 claimer
  • **
  • Posts: 93
  • Dr Viktor Kleber Plopenstein Creatore Del Centauro
Re: Should a Trifecta EVER Pay Less Than the Exacta?
« Reply #1 on: March 17, 2024, 04:13:42 PM »
Even if the 3rd place finisher was the 9-2 third choice?  This is what happened at Saratoga last Sunday (see chart below).  I know the pools are small, separate and the numbers may matter (in this case 4-3-2) but still... The $2 Exact paid $286.50 and the $2 Trifecta paid $269.  I could see this happening legitimately if the even money #1 horse was third due to Trifecta boxes but not with the 3rd choice.  I can hear the excuse now, the Exacta just paid extremely well.  What do you think?

     

That is an investigation needing to happen.  Full field, 1st, 2nd and 4th choice out.  Looks like 2 and 4 were the locks.  Maybe they drugged up the 1 to falter.  I watched the replay just now, Nice catch Babinga!  tmbz1
Death will join us together

onabrake

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 387
Re: Should a Trifecta EVER Pay Less Than the Exacta?
« Reply #2 on: March 17, 2024, 04:27:37 PM »
There was approx $ 53 total bet on the winning combo out of $ 9542 pool at 25% takeout. Nothing to see here, especially with the finishers coming from the 2,3 and 4 holes on a 1/2 mile track. Exacta paid real well and would normally be 150-175.

Doctor Plopenstein

  • 4 claimer
  • **
  • Posts: 93
  • Dr Viktor Kleber Plopenstein Creatore Del Centauro
Re: Should a Trifecta EVER Pay Less Than the Exacta?
« Reply #3 on: March 17, 2024, 04:39:39 PM »
There was approx $ 53 total bet on the winning combo out of $ 9542 pool at 25% takeout. Nothing to see here, especially with the finishers coming from the 2,3 and 4 holes on a 1/2 mile track. Exacta paid real well and would normally be 150-175.

Then it is nothing to see the betting patterns if the 1 was omitted and 2,4 say were wheeled for 1,2 1,3, and 2,3 positions.  The disproportional payout takes a minute for the NYS Commish to review, it's their  fucking job.

You also make a good point with the inside posts too, could be 1,2,3,4 boxes and a lucky hit with fav out.  tmbz1
Death will join us together

Parked

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2780
Re: Should a Trifecta EVER Pay Less Than the Exacta?
« Reply #4 on: March 17, 2024, 05:32:20 PM »
Just shy of 50% of the favorites win at the Spa and the rail horse hits the board 50% of the time. 

whiptherabbit

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2410
Re: Should a Trifecta EVER Pay Less Than the Exacta?
« Reply #5 on: March 17, 2024, 06:00:38 PM »
See it too often at Western Fair, I can see it when it’s flash betting off the wings, only two leaving…

Papillon

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2360
Re: Should a Trifecta EVER Pay Less Than the Exacta?
« Reply #6 on: March 18, 2024, 11:07:24 AM »
the bets come in after the bell from Lexington--well known fact for 20 years now

the "open window" is very much alive

Mailbox Money

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1231
Re: Should a Trifecta EVER Pay Less Than the Exacta?
« Reply #7 on: March 18, 2024, 11:35:10 AM »
The Open window in Lexington is becoming a bigger unsolved mystery than D.B.Cooper and the Ramsey girl! This is leading me to believe that Sasquatch has a gambling problem! ngc3

Papillon

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2360
Re: Should a Trifecta EVER Pay Less Than the Exacta?
« Reply #8 on: March 18, 2024, 11:48:47 AM »
The Open window in Lexington is becoming a bigger unsolved mystery than D.B.Cooper and the Ramsey girl! This is leading me to believe that Sasquatch has a gambling problem! ngc3

No mystery here--well known fact

these gatepunchers have sacrificed a chunk of their rebate to be allowed to bet after they see who blasted/who broke/what the lineup, etc

Stan durbread

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2168
Re: Should a Trifecta EVER Pay Less Than the Exacta?
« Reply #9 on: March 18, 2024, 01:14:21 PM »
My question about the rumor of late punchers   Is how they get away with it. The last investigation I saw about short payouts had the exact time of the ticket purchase down to the second. The place taking the bets usually has no way to control when the pools are locked

Papillon

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2360
Re: Should a Trifecta EVER Pay Less Than the Exacta?
« Reply #10 on: March 18, 2024, 01:18:15 PM »
the handle is needed so there is no investigation

Oliver Clozoff

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 307
Re: Should a Trifecta EVER Pay Less Than the Exacta?
« Reply #11 on: March 20, 2024, 02:39:11 AM »
Even if the 3rd place finisher was the 9-2 third choice?  This is what happened at Saratoga last Sunday (see chart below).  I know the pools are small, separate and the numbers may matter (in this case 4-3-2) but still... The $2 Exact paid $286.50 and the $2 Trifecta paid $269.  I could see this happening legitimately if the even money #1 horse was third due to Trifecta boxes but not with the 3rd choice.  I can hear the excuse now, the Exacta just paid extremely well.  What do you think?

     
[/quot

, I was at the Borgata recently one nite and watched some get bet $100 tri boxes on Cal Expo.  He had no program and was just betting numbers   Weird payoffs might just be some idiot in Vegas with too much money to lose.

 

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • Trigger: The Republicans control the Executive, the Congress, the Senate, The SCOTUS Judicial, they have their FBI and DOJ, enough of the blaming bullshit, they have what is known as a SUPER MAJORITY!
    Today at 12:04:35 PM
  • Trigger: Thomas Jacob Sanford killed 4 people while they were praying in a Mormon Church.  MAGA.  The Brown shooter give a green card by Trump admin in 2017.  Crazy is crazy dem or reb.
    Today at 12:00:24 PM
  • Unclejerry: What could possibly ever go wrong in Providence, RI which has:  A: A Gay mayor from Chicago married to Jim DeRentis.  B: A police chief from Mexico who can’t speak English.   C: A major Ivy League College charging $70,000 a year tuition with a high-tech 1,200 camera security system turned-off to keep ICE from arresting illegal immigrants.
    Today at 11:53:20 AM
  • Trigger: "They're eating the dogs!  They're eating the cats!  They're eating the pets!"  Merry Christmas America - President of the United States, Donald J. Trump
    Today at 08:36:09 AM
  • Trigger: Chihuahua Cock Karen  ngc3
    December 18, 2025, 09:49:22 PM
  • Trigger: Santa Claus has a holiday message to the men at Plop...If you go down any hot, new "chimney's" make sure you wrap your "package".  Go be naughty with a Ho Ho Ho!   ;D
    December 18, 2025, 09:01:25 PM
  • Trigger: Being Prez is a thankless JOB, unless someone does something special - US living longer, healing quicker, undivided and peaceful, and more of that with our allies...45 cents for gas c'mon Uncle Jerry, none of the leaders have been worth shit.
    December 18, 2025, 04:53:26 PM
  • Trigger: The man wears orange make up and yellow cotton candy dye in a combover style, perfectly normal.  ngc3
    December 18, 2025, 04:45:14 PM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal