Author Topic: Should a Trifecta EVER Pay Less Than the Exacta?  (Read 2558 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Babinga

  • Top Claimer
  • ***
  • Posts: 128
Should a Trifecta EVER Pay Less Than the Exacta?
« on: March 17, 2024, 04:00:38 PM »
Even if the 3rd place finisher was the 9-2 third choice?  This is what happened at Saratoga last Sunday (see chart below).  I know the pools are small, separate and the numbers may matter (in this case 4-3-2) but still... The $2 Exact paid $286.50 and the $2 Trifecta paid $269.  I could see this happening legitimately if the even money #1 horse was third due to Trifecta boxes but not with the 3rd choice.  I can hear the excuse now, the Exacta just paid extremely well.  What do you think?

     

Doctor Plopenstein

  • 4 claimer
  • **
  • Posts: 93
  • Dr Viktor Kleber Plopenstein Creatore Del Centauro
Re: Should a Trifecta EVER Pay Less Than the Exacta?
« Reply #1 on: March 17, 2024, 04:13:42 PM »
Even if the 3rd place finisher was the 9-2 third choice?  This is what happened at Saratoga last Sunday (see chart below).  I know the pools are small, separate and the numbers may matter (in this case 4-3-2) but still... The $2 Exact paid $286.50 and the $2 Trifecta paid $269.  I could see this happening legitimately if the even money #1 horse was third due to Trifecta boxes but not with the 3rd choice.  I can hear the excuse now, the Exacta just paid extremely well.  What do you think?

     

That is an investigation needing to happen.  Full field, 1st, 2nd and 4th choice out.  Looks like 2 and 4 were the locks.  Maybe they drugged up the 1 to falter.  I watched the replay just now, Nice catch Babinga!  tmbz1
Death will join us together

onabrake

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 387
Re: Should a Trifecta EVER Pay Less Than the Exacta?
« Reply #2 on: March 17, 2024, 04:27:37 PM »
There was approx $ 53 total bet on the winning combo out of $ 9542 pool at 25% takeout. Nothing to see here, especially with the finishers coming from the 2,3 and 4 holes on a 1/2 mile track. Exacta paid real well and would normally be 150-175.

Doctor Plopenstein

  • 4 claimer
  • **
  • Posts: 93
  • Dr Viktor Kleber Plopenstein Creatore Del Centauro
Re: Should a Trifecta EVER Pay Less Than the Exacta?
« Reply #3 on: March 17, 2024, 04:39:39 PM »
There was approx $ 53 total bet on the winning combo out of $ 9542 pool at 25% takeout. Nothing to see here, especially with the finishers coming from the 2,3 and 4 holes on a 1/2 mile track. Exacta paid real well and would normally be 150-175.

Then it is nothing to see the betting patterns if the 1 was omitted and 2,4 say were wheeled for 1,2 1,3, and 2,3 positions.  The disproportional payout takes a minute for the NYS Commish to review, it's their  fucking job.

You also make a good point with the inside posts too, could be 1,2,3,4 boxes and a lucky hit with fav out.  tmbz1
Death will join us together

Parked

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2792
Re: Should a Trifecta EVER Pay Less Than the Exacta?
« Reply #4 on: March 17, 2024, 05:32:20 PM »
Just shy of 50% of the favorites win at the Spa and the rail horse hits the board 50% of the time. 

whiptherabbit

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2439
Re: Should a Trifecta EVER Pay Less Than the Exacta?
« Reply #5 on: March 17, 2024, 06:00:38 PM »
See it too often at Western Fair, I can see it when it’s flash betting off the wings, only two leaving…

Papillon

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2466
Re: Should a Trifecta EVER Pay Less Than the Exacta?
« Reply #6 on: March 18, 2024, 11:07:24 AM »
the bets come in after the bell from Lexington--well known fact for 20 years now

the "open window" is very much alive

Mailbox Money

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1231
Re: Should a Trifecta EVER Pay Less Than the Exacta?
« Reply #7 on: March 18, 2024, 11:35:10 AM »
The Open window in Lexington is becoming a bigger unsolved mystery than D.B.Cooper and the Ramsey girl! This is leading me to believe that Sasquatch has a gambling problem! ngc3

Papillon

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2466
Re: Should a Trifecta EVER Pay Less Than the Exacta?
« Reply #8 on: March 18, 2024, 11:48:47 AM »
The Open window in Lexington is becoming a bigger unsolved mystery than D.B.Cooper and the Ramsey girl! This is leading me to believe that Sasquatch has a gambling problem! ngc3

No mystery here--well known fact

these gatepunchers have sacrificed a chunk of their rebate to be allowed to bet after they see who blasted/who broke/what the lineup, etc

Stan durbread

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2203
Re: Should a Trifecta EVER Pay Less Than the Exacta?
« Reply #9 on: March 18, 2024, 01:14:21 PM »
My question about the rumor of late punchers   Is how they get away with it. The last investigation I saw about short payouts had the exact time of the ticket purchase down to the second. The place taking the bets usually has no way to control when the pools are locked

Papillon

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2466
Re: Should a Trifecta EVER Pay Less Than the Exacta?
« Reply #10 on: March 18, 2024, 01:18:15 PM »
the handle is needed so there is no investigation

Oliver Clozoff

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 313
Re: Should a Trifecta EVER Pay Less Than the Exacta?
« Reply #11 on: March 20, 2024, 02:39:11 AM »
Even if the 3rd place finisher was the 9-2 third choice?  This is what happened at Saratoga last Sunday (see chart below).  I know the pools are small, separate and the numbers may matter (in this case 4-3-2) but still... The $2 Exact paid $286.50 and the $2 Trifecta paid $269.  I could see this happening legitimately if the even money #1 horse was third due to Trifecta boxes but not with the 3rd choice.  I can hear the excuse now, the Exacta just paid extremely well.  What do you think?

     
[/quot

, I was at the Borgata recently one nite and watched some get bet $100 tri boxes on Cal Expo.  He had no program and was just betting numbers   Weird payoffs might just be some idiot in Vegas with too much money to lose.

 

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • rainman2: Trigger-Foalin and the 'clan' here cannot read/comprehend well!  SAD BUT TRUE!
    Today at 06:31:14 PM
  • Trigger: Trump really did say he wanted to fuck ("date") Ivanka if it wasn't his daughter.  Perfectly normal.  tmbz1
    Today at 04:03:48 PM
  • Trigger: Rainman 2 - "Orange Koolaid Disease  ngc3 Fucking dude is funny!  ;D
    Today at 03:41:07 PM
  • dougie: Watching the races from Louisana Downs. Yikes A horse just wiped out half the field out of the gate. This track ain't getting my money. LOL! I remember years ago when Pompano Park had the quaterhorses for a couple of years. A lot of cowboy hats in the crowd. LOL!
    Today at 03:40:16 PM
  • Trigger: We can speed read, surely remember, and navigate this place in the blind if we had to and rapidly - you say it, did it, it's getting returned to you in spades - you lie - you're caught, 100% meney back guarantee if you're not deep fried plop style tmbz1
    Today at 02:46:47 PM
  • Trigger: If there was a Mike plop section, it'd run neck ane neck with Harness, that's why you're shit!
    Today at 02:00:11 PM
  • Trigger: Send him, Black Juice to the Plop Cornfield, Mike, so they can hang with Gootsie and the rest.  Mike, your Plop cemetary is getting full  ngc3
    Today at 01:56:58 PM
  • Ignorance Is Bliss: Did you know what Sakit means in Indonesian??? SICK. Fucking perfect.
    Today at 01:45:27 PM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal