Owners license

[brownmoose13]

The Racing Commissions and the USTA need to make a change to a current rule. Regardless of the percentage you own...even 1%..of any horse you must be licensed. What benefit do I get with a license as these 1%ers get to stand in the winners circle just like me. I feel if you are an owner then abide by ownership rules just like me.

[Bitter Truth]

I would have to say that purse $$ is more the focus than pictures.

[brownmoose13]

believe me those 1% are not making $$$ but live to have their picture taken and tell their friends they own part of a horse but never mention that the part is 1%. I have seen this more than once

[Bitter Truth]

What % of a horse must you own to requires licensing?

[brownmoose13]

Not sure as it varies from state to state but I have been told that unless you own more than 5% you do not need a license. As you can tell its real simple for me..either you are an owner or not

[Larry Bird Boy]

believe me those 1% are not making $$$ but live to have their picture taken and tell their friends they own part of a horse but never mention that the part is 1%. I have seen this more than once

Yeah I have too. It’s guys like horseplopper lucPark who brag about owning horses with big name trainers and overhiser put up all the money and lucPark owns like 5%

[Dingus]

Yeah I have too. It’s guys like horseplopper lucPark who brag about owning horses with big name trainers and overhiser put up all the money and lucPark owns like 5%

Hard to believe he only owns 5% when he is listed 1st as owner of some horses, 1st Avenue.

[rainman2]

Yeah I have too. It’s guys like horseplopper lucPark who brag about owning horses with big name trainers and overhiser put up all the money and lucPark owns like 5%

I lost track keeping tabs on all the horses has owned/currently owns.  I have 2 Lucpark stables in my pathway accounts.

What horses have you owned/currently own?  Asking for a friend or 2 on horseplop!!

[LUCPARK]

Hard to believe he only owns 5% when he is listed 1st as owner of some horses, 1st Avenue.

I’m listed first I own majority or at least fifty percent

When I’m not listed first it’s  either 25 or 33 percent

Nobody gets  listed first. With the smallest percentage

Last post on this or  u guys call horsemen’s bookkeeping for the same answer I just posted

But first avenue AKA CARL P
  Who busted out of the game yrs ago.
Is a little jelly tryin to get a rise outta me 


Don’t worry. Larry birdbrain

I’ll be buying more in two weeks 

[brownmoose13]

I know I could be wrong but I race at 4 different tracks and the purse money is only paid to one person, first person listed, as these tracks have no idea what % the listed owners have so Hoosier must be different.

[Larry Bird Boy]

I’m listed first I own majority or at least fifty percent

When I’m not listed first it’s  either 25 or 33 percent

Nobody gets  listed first. With the smallest percentage

Last post on this or  u guys call horsemen’s bookkeeping for the same answer I just posted

But first avenue AKA CARL P
  Who busted out of the game yrs ago.
Is a little jelly tryin to get a rise outta me 


Don’t worry. Larry birdbrain

I’ll be buying more in two weeks 

You mean overhiser will be buying more and then selling you 5-10% because he feels sorry for you

[rainman2]

You mean overhiser will be buying more and then selling you 5-10% because he feels sorry for you

How many states have you been/are currently licensed in past/present?  Asking for a friend or 2!

[Stan durbread]

The Racing Commissions and the USTA need to make a change to a current rule. Regardless of the percentage you own...even 1%..of any horse you must be licensed. What benefit do I get with a license as these 1%ers get to stand in the winners circle just like me. I feel if you are an owner then abide by ownership rules just like me.

The whole point of fractional ownership is getting more people involved in the industry. There was a no reason for someone that only owns 1% to have to get licenses in every jurisdiction. That would run people off faster than the ups and downs that naturally come with horse ownership

[brownmoose13]

The whole point of fractional ownership is getting more people involved in the industry. There was a no reason for someone that only owns 1% to have to get licenses in every jurisdiction. That would run people off faster than the ups and downs that naturally come with horse ownership

An owner is an owner in my opinion. As to losing the 1%ers how does that effect racing other than lining the pockets of certain trainers. Harness racing needs more people interested in the sport rather than people who need to brag to their friends and get their picture taken. Make everyone abide by the same I have to..its that simple

[AGUA CALIENTE]

Don't believe everything you read. You know who I'm talking about. JMHO