Author Topic: An interesting perspective on the Preakness  (Read 3469 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

dougie

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2849
An interesting perspective on the Preakness
« on: May 23, 2025, 05:00:24 PM »
There's a pretty interesting article on "Horse Racing Nation" concerning the inquiry for the Preakness. Bernie Hettel, a retired steward of over 40 years in Kentucky stated " I think I would have disqualified Journalism". He makes a good case for his opinion. If you get a chance, give it a read.

sledge hammer

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1725
Re: An interesting perspective on the Preakness
« Reply #1 on: May 23, 2025, 05:16:32 PM »
The fact that they took the inquiry down so quickly and no mention was made of it on the broadcasts was really bizarre. There would have been more information relayed to the public in a $5K claimer at Mountaineer.

talkstohisself

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 511
Re: An interesting perspective on the Preakness
« Reply #2 on: May 23, 2025, 05:52:10 PM »
that fast look was not a good look .  but at the end of the day the best horse won I bet the nine but that's racing I think both riders lost their cool  I am sure some words were exchanged in the jocks room. There's so much pressure to win and
with social media everyone wants to voice an opinion.  They race before,  Next was eased  and nothing was mentioned. The Ortiz brothers got away with rough ridding for a while until the officials started to get after them   This is a lot of hype for the Saratoga meet

Kirby's Ace

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 4934
Re: An interesting perspective on the Preakness
« Reply #3 on: May 23, 2025, 07:48:29 PM »
Somebody upstairs just got their envelope this week!

No way you can make that official without at least looking at it closely!
9/09/26 A day of celebration!

Weirwolf

  • 4 claimer
  • **
  • Posts: 65
Re: An interesting perspective on the Preakness
« Reply #4 on: May 24, 2025, 08:07:18 AM »
The fact that they took the inquiry down so quickly and no mention was made of it on the broadcasts was really bizarre. There would have been more information relayed to the public in a $5K claimer at Mountaineer.

I agree

Papillon

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2609
Re: An interesting perspective on the Preakness
« Reply #5 on: May 24, 2025, 09:01:02 AM »
The "inquiry" was for #1 causing a chain reaction, and I agree they should have taken a longer look

in no way was there any possibility that the winner was in question

they could have placed #1 behind #8--but in my opinion NBC told Pimlico not to drag this out-so they made it official quickly

Journalism was never ever thought of being to blame

the article is clickbait



JT

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 4205
Re: An interesting perspective on the Preakness
« Reply #6 on: May 24, 2025, 09:19:42 AM »
The "inquiry" was for #1 causing a chain reaction, and I agree they should have taken a longer look

in no way was there any possibility that the winner was in question

they could have placed #1 behind #8--but in my opinion NBC told Pimlico not to drag this out-so they made it official quickly

Journalism was never ever thought of being to blame

the article is clickbait
Right after the race ended I told my wife that Baffert's horse #1 will be sent down behind the 8. I still can't believe that didn't happen. From a parimutal perspective it only affected the super. After the Maximum Security debacle in the Derby, the powers that be don't want any controversy in the races with a lot of eyeballs watching, bad look for a novice watcher altering the finishing order.

 

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • Trigger: Got to protect your family, ya never know if you're speaking with, of a cyber psycho  ngc3
    Today at 03:09:51 PM
  • Trigger: Calm down, take a break, take a walk...jesus christ  ngc3
    Today at 03:08:15 PM
  • wiggles44: :)
    Today at 03:02:28 PM
  • dougie: Mike is much more elequent than I am.
    Today at 03:01:26 PM
  • wiggles44: Grammar mike.  :)
    Today at 02:59:50 PM
  • dougie: I'm not a good type. But no one should used my "Geez". Matbe i'll patent it. LOL!
    Today at 02:59:08 PM
  • wiggles44: And your grammar is not the best.  :)
    Today at 02:57:41 PM
  • wiggles44: I do see Mike use that word a few times in the search.  Andrew too.  :)
    Today at 02:57:21 PM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal