Running Aces Lowest Payoffs in Harness Racing Histoty

[captaintreacherous]

Pick 5.    $9.82

Place Pic all.  8 races       pays $2.36


it gets worse


Stick a fork in this dump

[teach2121]

the pick5 was $9.82 for 20 cents. thats $98.20 for a $2 bet, which is 48/1. Not spectacular but not awful at all. Let's use some common sense and basic math skills before spouting off stupidity.

good grief.

[gurals casino]

Pick 5.    $9.82

Place Pic all.  8 races       pays $2.36


it gets worse


Stick a fork in this dump

here we go again

it was a JACKPOT pick 5 with 5 odds on favorites

75% of the pool gets carried over and 25% is paid out

let us stick a fork in your dumb ass threads that you constantly start

not sure who starts more worthless threads

A- jc toronto-until next time

B-Wizard of Oz--starts/regurgitates threads that have the same topic for the last 5 years

C-YOU--obviously you are starving for attention starting nosensical threads

[Hambletonian46]

Harness racing's biggest failure is to provide a product that is conducive to wagering. There are thoroughbred county fairs with four horse races where nobody is odds-on. Putting stakes races aside, if you have an odds on favorite in every 8 horse race that is a failure to classify your horse population effectively.

I wish just one track would take this seriously and shake things up. I realize the issue with post position is a uniquely harness racing issue, but at least get rid of the ridiculous NW$x in L5 races with seven other optional conditions races. Maybe my memory fails me, but I don't recall anywhere near the number of odds on favorites under the old A-B-C conditions.

[whiptherabbit]

Going to the gate in the finale in Charlottetown, pick 4 .81 cents on a 20 cent bet on #2

[dougie]

Going to the gate in the finale in Charlottetown, pick 4 .81 cents on a 20 cent bet on #2

That's pretty sad!

[Mrpick5]

Yonkers late 80s-early 90s lineup exacters and tri payoffs were brutally low.