Author Topic: Anthony MacDonald / Lou Armstrong  (Read 1159 times)

brownmoose13 and 24 Guests are viewing this topic.

SDST2009

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 728
Re: Anthony MacDonald / Lou Armstrong
« Reply #15 on: Today at 10:24:06 AM »
and the other entry hit the board with Ronnie pushing the pace, thanks for proving my point.

I did not prove your point. There was zero reason to not let Ronnie go. He wasn’t going to back into him.
If you want to justify this guy getting the best horse beat, by all means go right ahead, though.

Call Sign Merlin

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 277
Re: Anthony MacDonald / Lou Armstrong
« Reply #16 on: Today at 10:47:32 AM »
Not a fan of this race and the timing - especially for the baby trotters.  Most have only had 1 maybe 2 qualifiers and now you are pushing them to the max because of the $150k purse.  Should find another window for it to happen or make it a series

titans1127

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Anthony MacDonald / Lou Armstrong
« Reply #17 on: Today at 11:11:28 AM »
Still baffles me that when AMac started The Stable, part of it had to do with him not being a very good driver.  He openly admitted that.  And yet 11 years later, he is always the one driving when the big money is on the line instead of using a more competent catch driver.

Swandre

  • Top Claimer
  • ***
  • Posts: 236
Re: Anthony MacDonald / Lou Armstrong
« Reply #18 on: Today at 11:20:49 AM »
I did not prove your point. There was zero reason to not let Ronnie go. He wasn’t going to back into him.
If you want to justify this guy getting the best horse beat, by all means go right ahead, though.

So you’re 1-1 going for $150k you’re going to let an unraced horse who hasn’t beat 2:00 go after the half so he can back it down to get the entry first over?

nah. was never going to happen and Wrenn knew it

I didn’t say it was a great drive by AM but it was a horrific drive by RW.

seen2much

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2600
Re: Anthony MacDonald / Lou Armstrong
« Reply #19 on: Today at 11:54:14 AM »
Those that do their research know A-Mac is an awful driver. Him driving is what you signed up for.
« Last Edit: Today at 11:57:32 AM by seen2much »

Sweet

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 10281
Re: Anthony MacDonald / Lou Armstrong
« Reply #20 on: Today at 11:56:50 AM »
So you’re 1-1 going for $150k you’re going to let an unraced horse who hasn’t beat 2:00 go after the half so he can back it down to get the entry first over?

nah. was never going to happen and Wrenn knew it

I didn’t say it was a great drive by AM but it was a horrific drive by RW.

You didn't do AMac any service today or before.

That's not even loyalty.

Just proving you're just as deranged as him in a different supporting role.

Openly acting and sounding like an @sshole.

You're obviously weak, and the little bit of intelligence you have you use to defend stupidity and blame others.

A good strong opinion sits down with AMac and asks what are your strongest abilities in this biz? 

You f'ing wait for an answer and keep your f'ing mouth shut, and then see from his own words what in any role he can play is salvageable.

More syndicates will start along TheStable lines, everyone shooting to be a successful Burke type fractional operation.

TheStable ain't it, at this rate will never be.  It's been vulnerable.  The lawsuits and investigations are immanent tmbz1


AsPromised

  • Top Claimer
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
Re: Anthony MacDonald / Lou Armstrong
« Reply #21 on: Today at 12:03:03 PM »
Amac says in his video he keeps playing back the race in his head and there is no other way he would have drove the horse. ngc3 ngc3



Sweet

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 10281
Re: Anthony MacDonald / Lou Armstrong
« Reply #22 on: Today at 12:08:14 PM »
Amac says in his video he keeps playing back the race in his head and there is no other way he would have drove the horse. ngc3 ngc3

 ngc3

Couldn't have been a worse drive and outcome, yet he said that. 

According to investors LA is racing in a week.

Case closed.

Sweet

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 10281
Re: Anthony MacDonald / Lou Armstrong
« Reply #23 on: Today at 12:11:22 PM »

 

shout out

Refresh History
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal