Author Topic: Anthony MacDonald / Lou Armstrong  (Read 1287 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

SDST2009

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 730
Re: Anthony MacDonald / Lou Armstrong
« Reply #15 on: Today at 10:24:06 AM »
and the other entry hit the board with Ronnie pushing the pace, thanks for proving my point.

I did not prove your point. There was zero reason to not let Ronnie go. He wasn’t going to back into him.
If you want to justify this guy getting the best horse beat, by all means go right ahead, though.

Call Sign Merlin

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 277
Re: Anthony MacDonald / Lou Armstrong
« Reply #16 on: Today at 10:47:32 AM »
Not a fan of this race and the timing - especially for the baby trotters.  Most have only had 1 maybe 2 qualifiers and now you are pushing them to the max because of the $150k purse.  Should find another window for it to happen or make it a series

titans1127

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Anthony MacDonald / Lou Armstrong
« Reply #17 on: Today at 11:11:28 AM »
Still baffles me that when AMac started The Stable, part of it had to do with him not being a very good driver.  He openly admitted that.  And yet 11 years later, he is always the one driving when the big money is on the line instead of using a more competent catch driver.

Swandre

  • Top Claimer
  • ***
  • Posts: 237
Re: Anthony MacDonald / Lou Armstrong
« Reply #18 on: Today at 11:20:49 AM »
I did not prove your point. There was zero reason to not let Ronnie go. He wasn’t going to back into him.
If you want to justify this guy getting the best horse beat, by all means go right ahead, though.

So you’re 1-1 going for $150k you’re going to let an unraced horse who hasn’t beat 2:00 go after the half so he can back it down to get the entry first over?

nah. was never going to happen and Wrenn knew it

I didn’t say it was a great drive by AM but it was a horrific drive by RW.

seen2much

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2601
Re: Anthony MacDonald / Lou Armstrong
« Reply #19 on: Today at 11:54:14 AM »
Those that do their research know A-Mac is an awful driver. Him driving is what you signed up for.
« Last Edit: Today at 11:57:32 AM by seen2much »

Sweet

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 10282
Re: Anthony MacDonald / Lou Armstrong
« Reply #20 on: Today at 11:56:50 AM »
So you’re 1-1 going for $150k you’re going to let an unraced horse who hasn’t beat 2:00 go after the half so he can back it down to get the entry first over?

nah. was never going to happen and Wrenn knew it

I didn’t say it was a great drive by AM but it was a horrific drive by RW.

You didn't do AMac any service today or before.

That's not even loyalty.

Just proving you're just as deranged as him in a different supporting role.

Openly acting and sounding like an @sshole.

You're obviously weak, and the little bit of intelligence you have you use to defend stupidity and blame others.

A good strong opinion sits down with AMac and asks what are your strongest abilities in this biz? 

You f'ing wait for an answer and keep your f'ing mouth shut, and then see from his own words what in any role he can play is salvageable.

More syndicates will start along TheStable lines, everyone shooting to be a successful Burke type fractional operation.

TheStable ain't it, at this rate will never be.  It's been vulnerable.  The lawsuits and investigations are immanent tmbz1


AsPromised

  • Top Claimer
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
Re: Anthony MacDonald / Lou Armstrong
« Reply #21 on: Today at 12:03:03 PM »
Amac says in his video he keeps playing back the race in his head and there is no other way he would have drove the horse. ngc3 ngc3



Sweet

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 10282
Re: Anthony MacDonald / Lou Armstrong
« Reply #22 on: Today at 12:08:14 PM »
Amac says in his video he keeps playing back the race in his head and there is no other way he would have drove the horse. ngc3 ngc3

 ngc3

Couldn't have been a worse drive and outcome, yet he said that. 

According to investors LA is racing in a week.

Case closed.

Sweet

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 10282
Re: Anthony MacDonald / Lou Armstrong
« Reply #23 on: Today at 12:11:22 PM »

brownmoose13

  • Top Claimer
  • ***
  • Posts: 227
Re: Anthony MacDonald / Lou Armstrong
« Reply #24 on: Today at 12:34:41 PM »
1. Wrenn's horse was 8/5 so evidently he was no slouch
2. So according to Amac Lou might have mucus or maybe it was his blood after it is tested.
3. Amac makes the comment that if he would have let Wrenn go he would have gotten pinned in by Wilder. When Amac was being Amac Wilder was at least 6 lengths behind.
4. If the idiot had let Wrenn go at the half, Wrenn most likely would have taken Amac to the top of the stretch so if you have the 1/2 shot you could either go to the right or go into the passing lane and at worst he is 2nd.
5. Amac needs a mirror since he has the lines and according to Amac its never his mistake, other than trying to take a shortcut going inside the pylons. It was Lou that made him go into the passing lane.
6. So lets see Amac put up $20K plus got $18 back and probably billed his sheep $2K-$3K for his amateur efforts taking into account his travel espenses.
Amac is and always has been a complete joke but I give him credit for following PT Barnum s philosophy that there is a sucker born every minute
7. Can't wait to see Lou's next start

Swandre

  • Top Claimer
  • ***
  • Posts: 237
Re: Anthony MacDonald / Lou Armstrong
« Reply #25 on: Today at 12:57:02 PM »
You didn't do AMac any service today or before.

That's not even loyalty.

Just proving you're just as deranged as him in a different supporting role.

Openly acting and sounding like an @sshole.

You're obviously weak, and the little bit of intelligence you have you use to defend stupidity and blame others.

A good strong opinion sits down with AMac and asks what are your strongest abilities in this biz? 

You f'ing wait for an answer and keep your f'ing mouth shut, and then see from his own words what in any role he can play is salvageable.

More syndicates will start along TheStable lines, everyone shooting to be a successful Burke type fractional operation.

TheStable ain't it, at this rate will never be.  It's been vulnerable.  The lawsuits and investigations are immanent tmbz1

You sound upset that someone has a different opinion than you.
try working on that.

SDST2009

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 730
Re: Anthony MacDonald / Lou Armstrong
« Reply #26 on: Today at 01:00:06 PM »
So you’re 1-1 going for $150k you’re going to let an unraced horse who hasn’t beat 2:00 go after the half so he can back it down to get the entry first over?


Yes. When the other part of the entry is 50-1, yes.

The only reason that horse hit the board is that Anthony didn't let that horse - who was the second choice in the first 2yo stake of the year, mind you - would easily have carried him as far as he needed to go. Let's assume your theory of an entry set up is accurate, despite what appears to be completely separate ownership. Who do you think, of Beachy's horses, was the one they were trying to set up to win?

Instead, AMac drives that really nice colt like he's the second coming of Nevele Pride, and ends up with nothing.

I agree it wasn't the best drive by Ronnie. When he ranged up there and saw AMac was in the process of f-ing up, he should've ducked. Cost them both any money at all.

SDST2009

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 730
Re: Anthony MacDonald / Lou Armstrong
« Reply #27 on: Today at 01:00:45 PM »
1. Wrenn's horse was 8/5 so evidently he was no slouch
2. So according to Amac Lou might have mucus or maybe it was his blood after it is tested.
3. Amac makes the comment that if he would have let Wrenn go he would have gotten pinned in by Wilder. When Amac was being Amac Wilder was at least 6 lengths behind.
4. If the idiot had let Wrenn go at the half, Wrenn most likely would have taken Amac to the top of the stretch so if you have the 1/2 shot you could either go to the right or go into the passing lane and at worst he is 2nd.
5. Amac needs a mirror since he has the lines and according to Amac its never his mistake, other than trying to take a shortcut going inside the pylons. It was Lou that made him go into the passing lane.
6. So lets see Amac put up $20K plus got $18 back and probably billed his sheep $2K-$3K for his amateur efforts taking into account his travel espenses.
Amac is and always has been a complete joke but I give him credit for following PT Barnum s philosophy that there is a sucker born every minute
7. Can't wait to see Lou's next start

 tmbz1

 

shout out

Refresh History
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal