0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I think he was 20 wins in 21 starts. I realize that's a full career nowadays... but I'm just old school I guess.im not saying race them 4 days a week like the clegg's do. It just goes back to a point I made earlier that it's a shame the greatest horses retire after 3 years old.
You geniuses with this theory that a horse has to race a certain amount of starts to be considered great is ridiculous. I guess Somebeachsomewher e was just a run of the mill creature.
This time you put words in my mouth. I never said Karl or Muscle Hill were not great because of lack of starts. I say to be considered the GREATEST dominating in the aged ranks at age 4 or 5 is a factor for me. Just my 2 cents. And not to beat a dead horse we don't know if Karl will race after this year.
Like when Artsplace raced as a 4 year old and went undefeated and still went on to have a great career as a sire
The insurance to keep them on the track is very expensive
Fine, SBSW didn't race at 4. However, if you put 100 REAL horsemen in a room, more than 3/4 would say he was the greatest pacer of all time.
SBSW only raced 18 times, mostly against Ontario Sire Stakes Gold Series competitionso yes, he wasnt even close the best evermore clock staring
I loved Muscle Hill his record speaks for itself. I wish he would have raced as a 4 year old but I understand why he didn't. Had he raced as an older horse and dominated like he did at ages 2 and 3... He would be my GOAT. Just not enough starts to be my GOAT
possibly 3yo GOATbut not up there with Mack Lobell or others on my list who raced at age 4 or 5you cannot extrapolate a great 3yo and say he would also have been just as great at age 4 or age 5
You're a fucking moron. He raced in the NA Cup. Meadowlands Pace, Confederation Cup, The Bluegrass, The Messenger, The Breeders Crown, The Burlington
Most of those horsemen must not have witnessed Niatross