Author Topic: Aqueduct race 1 pool manipulation  (Read 2552 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Papillon

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2565
Aqueduct race 1 pool manipulation
« on: February 05, 2026, 12:20:20 PM »
race 1--some entity placed a win wager of about $150k  on #2, (who was about 8/1 at the time), with about 3 minutes to post--making him go off 1/5

the horse took no place or show money to speak of and the exotics were the same

#4--who was the 1/2 fave for Linda Rice who figured to jog before the wager went in--jogged as expected and paid $10

very strange to see that at Aqueduct

« Last Edit: February 05, 2026, 12:40:56 PM by Papillon »

Checked Up

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 356
Re: Aqueduct race 1 pool manipulation
« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2026, 10:54:08 AM »
Rice shows up to race daily! It's rare for her send out a horse that never fires.  11.wp

Trigger

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 7635
Re: Aqueduct race 1 pool manipulation
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2026, 11:00:39 AM »
Could of been a book laying off the bet.

Papillon

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2565
Re: Aqueduct race 1 pool manipulation
« Reply #3 on: February 18, 2026, 11:30:13 AM »
OZONE PARK, N.Y. - The odds on horses in Thursday’s first race at Aqueduct were skewed when a large win wager came in on Patience N  Grace, a horse listed at 5-1 on the morning-line who went off at odds of 3-10 and finished fourth.

According to the New York Racing Association, a computer-assisted wagering player made $206,700 in win wagers within the final three minutes of the first race, a maiden event for fillies and mares. The player bet $182,442 on the No. 2, Patience N Grace; $23,556 on No. 5, Three Nines Fine, who finished sixth; and $702 on No. 6, Bustling Town, who finished seventh.


.

NYRA does not allow CAW players to cancel wagers after they are placed.

The race was won by Undergrad, who was 6-5 on the morning line, but who went off at 4-1 and returned $10.32 to win. The runner-up, Tahila, was sent off at odds of 111-1.

On Thursday, NYRA implemented restrictions on CAW activity, requiring their activity to cease at one minute to post in all pools not previously subject to high-speed wagering restrictions. However, it was back in 2021 that NYRA implemented restrictions for CAW players in the win pool, not allowing access to that pool with two minutes to post.

Calhoun

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 15631
Re: Aqueduct race 1 pool manipulation
« Reply #4 on: February 19, 2026, 08:55:42 AM »
race 1--some entity placed a win wager of about $150k  on #2, (who was about 8/1 at the time), with about 3 minutes to post--making him go off 1/5

the horse took no place or show money to speak of and the exotics were the same

#4--who was the 1/2 fave for Linda Rice who figured to jog before the wager went in--jogged as expected and paid $10

very strange to see that at Aqueduct
Take a look at Aqueduct Feb 11th. The Pick-3 for races 7-8-9.

The Pick 3 pools that day averaged about $25,000.

The pool for the Pick 3 ending in Race 9 was $715,000.

That's 27x the average. 

Nothing to see. Move along.

Papillon

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2565
Re: Aqueduct race 1 pool manipulation
« Reply #5 on: February 19, 2026, 12:35:31 PM »
Take a look at Aqueduct Feb 11th. The Pick-3 for races 7-8-9.

The Pick 3 pools that day averaged about $25,000.

The pool for the Pick 3 ending in Race 9 was $715,000.

That's 27x the average. 

Nothing to see. Move along.

according to the DRF charts-- Aqueduct race 7 on 11Feb had a pick 3 pool of $29300


-i see what you saw after the race 9 chart--looks like a typographical error
« Last Edit: February 19, 2026, 12:38:37 PM by Papillon »

Trigger

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 7635
Re: Aqueduct race 1 pool manipulation
« Reply #6 on: February 19, 2026, 01:07:02 PM »
according to the DRF charts-- Aqueduct race 7 on 11Feb had a pick 3 pool of $29300


-i see what you saw after the race 9 chart--looks like a typographical error

Could the DRF chart be a typo?

Papillon

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2565
Re: Aqueduct race 1 pool manipulation
« Reply #7 on: February 19, 2026, 01:39:49 PM »
Could the DRF chart be a typo?

happens all the time

apparently the charts show the pool amount at the end of the sequence as opposed to the start--in that case there is a good chance that pool was 27x the standard size without a typo
« Last Edit: February 19, 2026, 01:50:28 PM by Papillon »

 

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • Trigger: I'll give Laaaaaaary's soon to be widowed gf $1000.00 cash if she flushes his ashes down the toilet Live on the Mike show!  ;D
    Today at 12:11:55 AM
  • Trigger: He's a work horse, 10 fucking races, peaking, another improve, possible a little rating too, he's there!  tmbz1
    April 03, 2026, 11:37:55 PM
  • dougie: Great odds! He's got a shot! Worth a $20!
    April 03, 2026, 11:28:19 PM
  • Trigger: Dougie's Pavlovian is trading at 59-1 on the KYD Pool 6 market, you see an eclipse, it's his erection  ngc3
    April 03, 2026, 11:21:41 PM
  • dougie: Starting to "Dope" out tomorrows racing at the Big A. A pretty good card.
    April 03, 2026, 07:44:34 PM
  • Trigger: Undefeated Repole Zany is no more.
    April 03, 2026, 05:25:17 PM
  • Trigger: I meant Uk Healthcare Transylvania S.
    April 03, 2026, 05:00:07 PM
  • Trigger: That was the worst name ever for a stakes race - UK Transylvania Stakes, wtf  ngc3
    April 03, 2026, 04:58:43 PM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal