Author Topic: Aqueduct race 1 pool manipulation  (Read 712 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Papillon

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2506
Aqueduct race 1 pool manipulation
« on: February 05, 2026, 12:20:20 PM »
race 1--some entity placed a win wager of about $150k  on #2, (who was about 8/1 at the time), with about 3 minutes to post--making him go off 1/5

the horse took no place or show money to speak of and the exotics were the same

#4--who was the 1/2 fave for Linda Rice who figured to jog before the wager went in--jogged as expected and paid $10

very strange to see that at Aqueduct

« Last Edit: February 05, 2026, 12:40:56 PM by Papillon »

Checked Up

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 253
Re: Aqueduct race 1 pool manipulation
« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2026, 10:54:08 AM »
Rice shows up to race daily! It's rare for her send out a horse that never fires.  11.wp

Trigger

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 6326
Re: Aqueduct race 1 pool manipulation
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2026, 11:00:39 AM »
Could of been a book laying off the bet.

Papillon

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2506
Re: Aqueduct race 1 pool manipulation
« Reply #3 on: February 18, 2026, 11:30:13 AM »
OZONE PARK, N.Y. - The odds on horses in Thursday’s first race at Aqueduct were skewed when a large win wager came in on Patience N  Grace, a horse listed at 5-1 on the morning-line who went off at odds of 3-10 and finished fourth.

According to the New York Racing Association, a computer-assisted wagering player made $206,700 in win wagers within the final three minutes of the first race, a maiden event for fillies and mares. The player bet $182,442 on the No. 2, Patience N Grace; $23,556 on No. 5, Three Nines Fine, who finished sixth; and $702 on No. 6, Bustling Town, who finished seventh.


.

NYRA does not allow CAW players to cancel wagers after they are placed.

The race was won by Undergrad, who was 6-5 on the morning line, but who went off at 4-1 and returned $10.32 to win. The runner-up, Tahila, was sent off at odds of 111-1.

On Thursday, NYRA implemented restrictions on CAW activity, requiring their activity to cease at one minute to post in all pools not previously subject to high-speed wagering restrictions. However, it was back in 2021 that NYRA implemented restrictions for CAW players in the win pool, not allowing access to that pool with two minutes to post.

Calhoun

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 15480
Re: Aqueduct race 1 pool manipulation
« Reply #4 on: Today at 08:55:42 AM »
race 1--some entity placed a win wager of about $150k  on #2, (who was about 8/1 at the time), with about 3 minutes to post--making him go off 1/5

the horse took no place or show money to speak of and the exotics were the same

#4--who was the 1/2 fave for Linda Rice who figured to jog before the wager went in--jogged as expected and paid $10

very strange to see that at Aqueduct
Take a look at Aqueduct Feb 11th. The Pick-3 for races 7-8-9.

The Pick 3 pools that day averaged about $25,000.

The pool for the Pick 3 ending in Race 9 was $715,000.

That's 27x the average. 

Nothing to see. Move along.

Papillon

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2506
Re: Aqueduct race 1 pool manipulation
« Reply #5 on: Today at 12:35:31 PM »
Take a look at Aqueduct Feb 11th. The Pick-3 for races 7-8-9.

The Pick 3 pools that day averaged about $25,000.

The pool for the Pick 3 ending in Race 9 was $715,000.

That's 27x the average. 

Nothing to see. Move along.

according to the DRF charts-- Aqueduct race 7 on 11Feb had a pick 3 pool of $29300


-i see what you saw after the race 9 chart--looks like a typographical error
« Last Edit: Today at 12:38:37 PM by Papillon »

Trigger

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 6326
Re: Aqueduct race 1 pool manipulation
« Reply #6 on: Today at 01:07:02 PM »
according to the DRF charts-- Aqueduct race 7 on 11Feb had a pick 3 pool of $29300


-i see what you saw after the race 9 chart--looks like a typographical error

Could the DRF chart be a typo?

Papillon

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2506
Re: Aqueduct race 1 pool manipulation
« Reply #7 on: Today at 01:39:49 PM »
Could the DRF chart be a typo?

happens all the time

apparently the charts show the pool amount at the end of the sequence as opposed to the start--in that case there is a good chance that pool was 27x the standard size without a typo
« Last Edit: Today at 01:50:28 PM by Papillon »

 

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • Trigger: Time to get back to my harness racing wagering roots, BigM Saturday - Mohawk bad weather forecasted Fri & Sat  tmbz1
    Today at 01:52:26 PM
  • Calhoun: Gulf Race 6..#7 Keep Moving my Chalk Eating Weasel Tout
    Today at 01:26:55 PM
  • Trigger: Minimum wage Trump proganda doggie
    Today at 01:22:21 PM
  • Trigger: Chihuahua cock chasing losing tickets, where are your winners?  ngc3 When do you ever make a prediction and put yourself out there, coward Karen?  ;D
    Today at 01:21:00 PM
  • darnoldrocks: That's the least tigger has lost on a wager this year!!  Well done.
    Today at 01:08:32 PM
  • Papillon: you are correct-cannot lose with that one
    Today at 12:40:45 PM
  • Papillon: Howling Wind is scratched
    Today at 12:40:07 PM
  • dougie: Trigger.....I will bet him.
    Today at 10:41:14 AM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal