Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Harness Racing / Re: Supplementing to the Jug.....
« Last post by Harness racer on Today at 05:07:18 PM »
BJ will be a no show.   tmbz1
2
Political Roundtable / Re: my reason
« Last post by Lockedin with Pace on Today at 04:34:44 PM »
There’s nothing to ‘apologize’ for!
A done deal!
Thank you Sherlock Holmes for your keen observation skills!
Thanx for posting.


Just wondering if you've ever served on a jury and if so, did it wind up a hung jury because of you. The vote was 11-1, you being the only holdout, and refused to budge.
3
Harness Racing / Re: THIS SITE
« Last post by Sweet on Today at 04:30:48 PM »
You're too much of a pussy to respond to your haters and I promise you, there are MANY!

 ngc3 ngc3 ngc3

He's trying to gentrify plop ngc3

He's such a bore, his last 10 PR stories garnered an avg of 5 comments, they have 86,000 subscribers.  ngc3
4
Harness Racing / Supplementing to the Jug.....
« Last post by Grandstand Handicapper on Today at 04:30:06 PM »
Sounds like John Pentland is seriously considering ponying up $45,000 and supplementing Redland Rocket Man to the Little Brown Jug. He turned down all offers and he might just decide to take this shot. Supplemental entries are due this Saturday, and regular entries on Monday.

So.....is Beau Jangles going?
5
I view the allowance for the female's to be a sort of" Insurance Premium" in case of any performance issues or lameness since they can contribute to racing by  becoming a broodmare. I have seen a  few mares that were claimed specifically for the breeding pen.

I think part of the reason few are claimed for breeding is because they just don't get to that point in their career. Even if a filly/mare is racing well, if they are worth money as a broodmare, nobody is going to put them in a claimer-----at least not for anything close to what she's worth. Last time I had a mare with pedigree value and her racing career wasn't over, she couldn't compete at the Meadowlands, or YR, without a tag, so I shipped her out of town to race her. But, I agree with the insurance premium concept. It's still a good idea. Might not fly though, LOL.
6
Hi, I just read your message and responded, but It won't allow me to respond to you as it says you have me blocked.

I’ll fix that
Done
7
Harness Racing / Re: What big races are left?
« Last post by Grandstand Handicapper on Today at 04:14:37 PM »
The GC goes straight through to the BC. I think there are more options now, but between the Metro for 2yo's, the Jug for 3yo's-----although it's lost a lot of it's prestige, from both the sport side and with the breeders, and then Lexington; there's a lot for the real fans. As far as marque events, maybe in the eye of the beholder-----Metro, Jug, Kentucky Futurity, the Tattersalls Pace maybe, some might say the Bluegrass, and the International Stallion Stakes. But, as they say, it all comes down to the Breeders Crown.
8
I can vouch for Tumbleweed because he had a horse with my trainer at Tioga last year.
Did I hurt anyone’s feelings by saying that?
Does that make me someone who defends Mike P?

Hi, I just read your message and responded, but It won't allow me to respond to you as it says you have me blocked.
9
Harness Racing / Re: THIS SITE
« Last post by MIKE CAMPBELL on Today at 04:13:39 PM »
Spot on. Couldn't be more true.
You're too much of a pussy to respond to your haters and I promise you, there are MANY!
10
You can direct message me anytime G and i will prove i am not Mike.

I can vouch for Tumbleweed because he had a horse with my trainer at Tioga last year.
Did I hurt anyone’s feelings by saying that?
Does that make me someone who defends Mike P?
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • Sweet: Define Chihuahua Cock  ngc3
    Today at 05:27:52 PM
  • darnoldrocks: Dougie, define humanely?
    Today at 05:20:20 PM
  • Lockedin with Pace: dougie---with some people if they know 5 positive things a person has done and one negative, they'll completely focus on the negative.
    Today at 05:18:35 PM
  • dougie: I will make another point if I may. There are multiple horse owners in this group. LUCPARK, rainman2, and so many others. many here are very successful owning horses. I and my partners were not. But I can't believe people who do well in the game and folks like me who didn't cant agree that the horses should be treated humanely. The history of Mike P. might be interesting to people. And folks on Plop might dislike him for a myriad of reasons. I know nothing about him but his advocacy. I think I can seperate the misdeeds everyone talks about from his desire to help these horses.
    Today at 05:14:54 PM
  • dougie: lumped into their misdeeds. Sorry, my typing is off today.
    Today at 04:58:08 PM
  • dougie: Calhoun, I am not surprised at anyone who doesn't share my opinion. Everyone has the right to their own point of view. As for whatever acts you mentioned=Ed that he might have committed, it should not draw away from his horses advocacy. Many folks have done lots of things wrong. But despite that, should the good things they do be li=jumped into their misdeeds? Is a person to be judgedf on their worst day or instinct? Like I mentioned before, I don't know of the man. But I have studied up on him. I cannot answer for the things you and others seem to know about him as a human being. But I will continue to support his efforts to make the treatment of horses more humane.
    Today at 04:57:14 PM
  • Calhoun: Doug, Legit horse welfare advocacy is good. But your hero's current iteration is his 3rd such "alliance." You want to know why, DM me your email. You want to support the guy who baits working people into taking a swipe at him, good for you. You want to support the guy who steps behind a 75 yo man and lets that guy take a punch meant for him, go for it. You called me every name in the book, that;s ok. But your opinion is just that. But it's disingenuous to act surprised that others don't share your opinion.
    Today at 04:48:48 PM
  • dougie: I think that people should applaud anyone interested in the welfare of horses. Carriage or racing horses. To this day, I've never understood the venom spewed against a guy who seems to want to clean up racing. Some might question his motive for his advocacy. But why would anyone care if the result benefits the horses? If you attack the "messenger' in a cause, shouldn't the detractors have a valid reason why they attack him. Or is it only personable. I never met Mike. But I think his wanting to do the right thing is admirable.
    Today at 03:58:04 PM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal