Author Topic: Lexington Sale Lawsuit  (Read 3906 times)

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Parked

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2780
Re: Lexington Sale Lawsuit
« Reply #30 on: December 16, 2025, 04:55:43 PM »
Ever notice the seller or his agent sits in the booth next to the pedigree reader or salesman (auctioneer) ?  That person can simply say yes to an asking price or be more subtile like putting his hands on the desk as long as he wants the auctioneer to go on, take them off when he is done. 

AgentQ

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 265
Re: Lexington Sale Lawsuit
« Reply #31 on: December 16, 2025, 08:25:59 PM »
The people that try to justify the games certain breeders play at the sales, are the same people that justify trainers that win at outrageously high rates. Why not give everyone an electronic device before the horse goes into the sales ring that has an interest, you press your device and if you see your corresponding number on the board, then you're the highest bidder. Sounds simple because it is but they will never do it because that way they couldn't fleece the millionaires.

Stan durbread

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2162
Re: Lexington Sale Lawsuit
« Reply #32 on: Today at 05:51:17 AM »
You don’t think the smart sellers would just pay someone to register and bid with your electronic device. WTF. I still don’t understand why you think anyone is getting fleeced. Just like with boats, if you think it is too much buy the next one.

AgentQ

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 265
Re: Lexington Sale Lawsuit
« Reply #33 on: Today at 10:17:35 AM »
You comment makes no sense, anyone bidding with an electronic device would be responsible and every bid could be tracked digitally. That's the professional way to conduct a sale, if a consignor or breeder want to bid up their horse so be it. But when the hammer falls the horse goes to the highest bidder and if they forget to press the button or their consignor forgets to that's on them and no circus and lawsuits. I'm all for breeders placing reserves or buying back their horses if they are not happy with what the market offers but it must be done in a fair manner for the market. You cannot run up horses and play games when people are told they are the highest bidder. Integrity is everything at a horse sale and unfortunately too many breeders have none.

Foalin at 4

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 696
Re: Lexington Sale Lawsuit
« Reply #34 on: Today at 10:33:32 AM »
You comment makes no sense, anyone bidding with an electronic device would be responsible and every bid could be tracked digitally. That's the professional way to conduct a sale, if a consignor or breeder want to bid up their horse so be it. But when the hammer falls the horse goes to the highest bidder and if they forget to press the button or their consignor forgets to that's on them and no circus and lawsuits. I'm all for breeders placing reserves or buying back their horses if they are not happy with what the market offers but it must be done in a fair manner for the market. You cannot run up horses and play games when people are told they are the highest bidder. Integrity is everything at a horse sale and unfortunately too many breeders have none.
 

    tmbz1

Brown jug

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3566
Re: Lexington Sale Lawsuit
« Reply #35 on: Today at 01:08:20 PM »
good points Q
with todays technology there is no reason to be running auctions they way they were 30 years or more ago
 i know they have the online bidding but putting the live auction in the hands of bid spotter most of whom seem to be over 70 is not as good idea
add in that it allows the auction house to fleece bids and there is no need for it anymore
its all for show  and manipulation

Calhoun

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 15235
Re: Lexington Sale Lawsuit
« Reply #36 on: Today at 02:03:27 PM »
You comment makes no sense, anyone bidding with an electronic device would be responsible and every bid could be tracked digitally. That's the professional way to conduct a sale, if a consignor or breeder want to bid up their horse so be it. But when the hammer falls the horse goes to the highest bidder and if they forget to press the button or their consignor forgets to that's on them and no circus and lawsuits. I'm all for breeders placing reserves or buying back their horses if they are not happy with what the market offers but it must be done in a fair manner for the market. You cannot run up horses and play games when people are told they are the highest bidder. Integrity is everything at a horse sale and unfortunately too many breeders have none.
Agreed

What is the legitimate purpose of a reserve?

Why not just set a minimum bid at what would have been the reserve price?

Parked

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2780
Re: Lexington Sale Lawsuit
« Reply #37 on: Today at 02:09:34 PM »
good points Q
with todays technology there is no reason to be running auctions they way they were 30 years or more ago
 i know they have the online bidding but putting the live auction in the hands of bid spotter most of whom seem to be over 70 is not as good idea
add in that it allows the auction house to fleece bids and there is no need for it anymore
its all for show  and manipulation
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

Parked

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2780
Re: Lexington Sale Lawsuit
« Reply #38 on: Today at 02:12:26 PM »
Agreed

What is the legitimate purpose of a reserve?

Why not just set a minimum bid at what would have been the reserve price?
Great idea. The sale (auction) would be over in one day. 

 

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • Trigger: Flawed, if there is a carryover not every combo is being played.  You can't make money having playing AAAAAA if there 200 winners.  If CAW is winning everything why play, they're surviving off a low % of rebate against win/loss and work with gigantic volume.
    Today at 03:23:38 PM
  • Papillon: o agree with MTP1972-much more CAW action in the carryovers-not sure how much more than standard-the carryover is a mirage
    Today at 03:12:37 PM
  • MTP1972: I have a different take on carryovers. If you're betting a track who has a good handle like Mohawk the Early Pick 5 pool is around $100,000, maybe $50,000 for the Pick 4 pool. When there's a carryover the CAW's bet thousands into the pool and have every combination covered multiple times. In a smaller pool there's a better chance for a big score because less of their money is in there, same for the Pick 6 in California.
    Today at 02:57:34 PM
  • Trigger: Thanks Calhoun, GL to you too, big scores ahead!  Check out Mohawk last Sat early p5, $67891.89 .20 payout w/ 3 horses < 3-1 odds, the other 2 races, nw1 and claimers, wow, the perfect storm.
    Today at 02:47:14 PM
  • Calhoun: Yeah, moron is way too lazy.
    Today at 02:34:32 PM
  • Calhoun: Trigger, $25k/$500per week. Sounds great. IMO, you have 2 best options. 1) 100% of play on certain CarryOvers.  Pick-5 Carryovers are best. Pro is Near EV or +EV. Con is it's a ton of work in 1 day at worst or 3/4 days at best. But $500 gets you a lot of coverage. ..2) Focus 100% on one track, WITHOUT a lot of ship Ins. Woodbine, Remington, SoCal and Texas fit. WDB and Rem closed/closing. Whichever you choose, you need to know every single horse. You MUST have access to workout videos. You need to learn trainers. Good Luck
    Today at 02:32:39 PM
  • Trigger: I guess I took offense that he called me a moron twice in the post while being factual wrong about the subject.  I'd prefer he call me an asshole!  ;D
    Today at 02:30:26 PM
  • Calhoun: Cashout is very sharp poster. Solid opinions. jmmvhmfo
    Today at 02:12:10 PM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal