0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
what do you mean buyer beware, ??how does that fit in this casethe only buyer bid $15k , was the last bid and was awarded the horse as he should have been
The auctioneer made a mistake in not recognizing the reserve immediately but there was a reserve put on the horse by its owner. The owner has right to sell his horse at what he thinks it worth not what the buyer is willing to pay.Reserves are common in all auctions. Buyers need to be aware that going to the auction that there could be a reserve on a horse they are bidding on. Buyer beware.
Why don't they just set a minimum bid at the reserve price?
Because they want to screw the buyer. Buyers would back off if they knew some of the actual reserves. This is why I said buyer beware because you never know who you’re bidding against. It’s not just horse auctions either major auction houses have reserves that aren’t disclosed before the auction starts.
The conditions of this sale say's "TITLE PASSES TO THE BUYER AT THE FALL OF THE HAMMER, AT WHICH TIME ALL RISK OF INJURY OR LOSS AND ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE HORSE PASSES TO THE BUYER"! All in Capitol letters!!!!
It also states sellers have a right to put a reserve on that doesn’t have to be disclosed. Also states auctioneer can reopen bidding if there’s a dispute between two bidders. As I stated before the court will have to decide if a reserve put on by the owner is considered a bidder.