0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I've been wondering how much things have changed in the sport in the last ten years or so--.Always thought of Yonkers leading the pack.So I used the handle info on the USTA site and my abacus to compare the total track handles on Thurs, Nov 20. I have time on my hands now...Used Tues the 18th for PCD.So these are the handles PER RACEMonti---50,755Yonkers-30,399Chester-26,142Pocono-19,535Seems to me that bettors are turned off by the style of racing at Yonkers where horses outside the 5 rarely leave/try.For a track that has been denigrated and disparaged as the quintissential "B" track, it appears that bettors like the product.Is it becoming a haven for the gamblers? more driver antics?And whats up at Pocono?
years ago in the aldrich years they wanted a million a night at northfield. i think they would hit it on the regular if im not mistaken.not sure what it is now a days.aldrich would play games and wait until the money came in. then he would tell the starter when to go.
I’m willing to say the majority of these handles (85%+) are computerized bots betting for rebates
I would say this estimate is close to realitya few months ago i said the amount of CAW handle was around 50% at most tracks and was mocked and chastised --but then suddenly a few agreed with me85% seems high but certainly within the realms of reality
I don’t think having seeded liquidity in the pools is necessarily a negative thing I think the biggest thing that’ll help the wagering handles is fixed odds Prediction markets are a textbook example as long as markets have consistent liquidityThe public is slowly but surely becoming more educated on exchange style wagering and the learning curve is thereLegally speaking, who knows with how slow things move in this country if it could ever become a reality