Author Topic: Nijinsky no McKee  (Read 10251 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

The Answer

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 494
Nijinsky no McKee
« on: July 29, 2025, 04:37:51 PM »
Who would of predicted this?

AgentQ

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 542
Re: Nijinsky no McKee
« Reply #1 on: July 29, 2025, 05:02:07 PM »
Casie is undefeated in breaking down young horses--nobody even close to her record.

Harness racer

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 4993
Re: Nijinsky no McKee
« Reply #2 on: July 29, 2025, 05:41:43 PM »
Definitely only worried about making the money as fast as she can with no care about the horse's long term well being.

seen2much

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3245
Re: Nijinsky no McKee
« Reply #3 on: July 29, 2025, 08:07:29 PM »
If they are doing out of comp. testing there is no reason to show up. CC is another trainer whose success was not real.

clearmind

  • Top Claimer
  • ***
  • Posts: 105
Re: Nijinsky no McKee
« Reply #4 on: July 30, 2025, 12:19:08 PM »
         I strongly disagree with your assessments of CC.
Unlike the real cheaters like Allard, CC had the same winning % in retention then out of retention. Allard could not beat a fat man out of a shit pile and was barred from racing on the WEG circuit.
    You don't produce stallions like American Ideal Betterthencheddar Sportwriter McWicked with PEDs.
 

Chips N Salsa

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1230
Re: Nijinsky no McKee
« Reply #5 on: July 30, 2025, 12:37:57 PM »
         I strongly disagree with your assessments of CC.
Unlike the real cheaters like Allard, CC had the same winning % in retention then out of retention. Allard could not beat a fat man out of a shit pile and was barred from racing on the WEG circuit.
    You don't produce stallions like American Ideal Betterthencheddar Sportwriter McWicked with PEDs.

CC didn't produce American Ideal - who was given to her.  The rest are horrible fake sires and no one wants to breed to them.  Tell me how she owns horses with Navarro, Surick and Oaks and doesn't get questioned?  You want us all to believe she didn't know what they were doing to her T-breds that they spent HUGE money on?  The queen on EPO & special yogurt and now mysteriously retired and shovels ozempic by the syringe full.  Has this girl done anything legit in her life?????

Harness racer

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 4993
Re: Nijinsky no McKee
« Reply #6 on: July 30, 2025, 12:55:08 PM »
Many think she was the 🐀 !     tmbz1

ferdinand the bull

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1145
Re: Nijinsky no McKee
« Reply #7 on: July 30, 2025, 02:23:25 PM »
         I strongly disagree with your assessments of CC.
Unlike the real cheaters like Allard, CC had the same winning % in retention then out of retention. Allard could not beat a fat man out of a shit pile and was barred from racing on the WEG circuit.
    You don't produce stallions like American Ideal Betterthencheddar Sportwriter McWicked with PEDs.
the blood building peds are used way before retention time and even in retention she still got the "yogurt" into them . Don't be giving CC a pass . There's a reason she's not down as traner anymore

Brown jug

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3993
Re: Nijinsky no McKee
« Reply #8 on: July 30, 2025, 04:28:07 PM »
right on fellas
american ideal was before the ped started
betting line, mcwicked  etc , no thanks

PineHurstPacer

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 610
Re: Nijinsky no McKee
« Reply #9 on: July 30, 2025, 05:33:27 PM »
where is timeonmyside?

AgentQ

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 542
Re: Nijinsky no McKee
« Reply #10 on: July 30, 2025, 08:54:43 PM »
If you think she gave every known vitamin and used every medical device on her horses but stopped at the blood builders than you're a bigger idiot than I thought possible. Furthermore, Robinson and Gelrod used EPO on all their good horses and last time i checked many of them are todays leading sires, art major--mach three-etc

clearmind

  • Top Claimer
  • ***
  • Posts: 105
Re: Nijinsky no McKee
« Reply #11 on: July 31, 2025, 04:37:51 PM »
      Pelling went back home for 10 years and it wasn't because he wanted to but because he had to. Gelrod and Robinson they got caught and if you look today a lot of their owners are still in the business.
    you might say what you want about CC, BUT she never got caught.
     Without a doubt the best yearling picker ever and you might think she's dirty but she never got caught.

seen2much

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3245
Re: Nijinsky no McKee
« Reply #12 on: July 31, 2025, 07:04:08 PM »
      Pelling went back home for 10 years and it wasn't because he wanted to but because he had to. Gelrod and Robinson they got caught and if you look today a lot of their owners are still in the business.
    you might say what you want about CC, BUT she never got caught.
     Without a doubt the best yearling picker ever and you might think she's dirty but she never got caught.
You don't count the yogurt incident? Like Pelling CC did not go away on her own.

Lance

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1139
Re: Nijinsky no McKee
« Reply #13 on: July 31, 2025, 09:35:25 PM »
You don't count the yogurt incident? Like Pelling CC did not go away on her own.

What the fuck are you talking about….did she not win the jug that day?

seen2much

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3245
Re: Nijinsky no McKee
« Reply #14 on: July 31, 2025, 10:14:44 PM »
What the fuck are you talking about….did she not win the jug that day?
Betting Line wins Little Brown Jug amid controversy.
Published 8:28 PM EDT, September 22, 2016
Share
DELAWARE, Ohio (AP) — Heavily favored Betting Line captured the Little Brown Jug under a cloud of controversy on Thursday after the discovery of text messages that implied the winning horse may have been given an unauthorized supplement.

 

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • Trigger: Got to protect your family, ya never know if you're speaking with, of a cyber psycho  ngc3
    Today at 03:09:51 PM
  • Trigger: Calm down, take a break, take a walk...jesus christ  ngc3
    Today at 03:08:15 PM
  • wiggles44: :)
    Today at 03:02:28 PM
  • dougie: Mike is much more elequent than I am.
    Today at 03:01:26 PM
  • wiggles44: Grammar mike.  :)
    Today at 02:59:50 PM
  • dougie: I'm not a good type. But no one should used my "Geez". Matbe i'll patent it. LOL!
    Today at 02:59:08 PM
  • wiggles44: And your grammar is not the best.  :)
    Today at 02:57:41 PM
  • wiggles44: I do see Mike use that word a few times in the search.  Andrew too.  :)
    Today at 02:57:21 PM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal