Author Topic: Mohawk should apologize  (Read 7481 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Horseshoe

  • Top Claimer
  • ***
  • Posts: 103
Re: Mohawk should apologize
« Reply #30 on: December 29, 2024, 10:54:19 PM »
12 horses only on mandatory payout nights????

The only time this wager should be carried over
is when there is no winner.

After all the monies should be paid out with winners
the same night as they wager.

Also the wager on the H5 would increase dramatically on a nightly basis.

bestbetter

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 370
Re: Mohawk should apologize
« Reply #31 on: December 30, 2024, 04:25:40 AM »
It still pays pretty good...

gh2009

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1605
Re: Mohawk should apologize
« Reply #32 on: December 30, 2024, 05:39:44 AM »
12 horses only on mandatory payout nights????

The only time this wager should be carried over
is when there is no winner.

After all the monies should be paid out with winners
the same night as they wager.

Also the wager on the H5 would increase dramatically on a nightly basis.

Most, if not all tracks now carryover the pool if there's more than one winner because they know people will bet more. Some tracks even carryover the Superfecta pool to the next race if it isn't hit.
« Last Edit: December 30, 2024, 05:42:48 AM by gh2009 »

mwins

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 718
Re: Mohawk should apologize
« Reply #33 on: December 30, 2024, 10:50:07 AM »
They want to make it as difficult as possible, so you'll spend more money on your ticket.

Thank you, Captain Obvious.

Brown jug

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3429
Re: Mohawk should apologize
« Reply #34 on: December 30, 2024, 11:09:33 AM »
weird
everyone complains about the chalk fest at a lot of  harness tracks,
how pathetic harness is compared to tbreds who have full fields and bigger payouts
how amazing japan and china t breds are
and then a harnness track adds 2 horses to a field to spread out the money and get a decent payout and everyone complains
i guess most of you would be happy with a 6 or 7 horse fields and a 1/5 shot in the mandatory race



pylon

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 648
Re: Mohawk should apologize
« Reply #35 on: December 30, 2024, 11:21:24 AM »
Brown Jug makes valid points........... ..too many 1/5 and 2/5 at Mohawk....but what bothers me is alot of horses are 8/5 or 9/5...as they line up behind the car but then as the wings fold they go down to 3/5 and lower....and lately the EX and Tri handle are higher than the Win betting.....not sure if that was always the case...

gh2009

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1605
Re: Mohawk should apologize
« Reply #36 on: December 30, 2024, 11:22:11 AM »
Thank you, Captain Obvious.

Actually, I'm a General!

mwins

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 718
Re: Mohawk should apologize
« Reply #37 on: December 30, 2024, 05:32:13 PM »
weird
everyone complains about the chalk fest at a lot of  harness tracks,
how pathetic harness is compared to tbreds who have full fields and bigger payouts
how amazing japan and china t breds are
and then a harnness track adds 2 horses to a field to spread out the money and get a decent payout and everyone complains
i guess most of you would be happy with a 6 or 7 horse fields and a 1/5 shot in the mandatory race

Since they built the pool on 10 horse fields it makes more sense fo have a 10 horse field for the mandatory.

If you don't think that matters, why not, on mandatory nights, make it a $1 minimum bet?

Brown jug

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3429
Re: Mohawk should apologize
« Reply #38 on: December 30, 2024, 06:20:08 PM »
are you suggesting that every race that built that pool had 10 horses??
sure there was some with less based on scratches etc
accept the challenge and handicap and bet the race

Stan durbread

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2070
Re: Mohawk should apologize
« Reply #39 on: December 30, 2024, 06:32:58 PM »
Since they built the pool on 10 horse fields it makes more sense fo have a 10 horse field for the mandatory.

If you don't think that matters, why not, on mandatory nights, make it a $1 minimum bet?

They have been doing it this way for 10+ years. Why cry now

SeattleSlew

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
Re: Mohawk should apologize
« Reply #40 on: December 31, 2024, 04:40:04 AM »
Thank you, Captain Obvious.

GREAT!!

 ngc3 ngc3 ngc3 ngc3 ngc3 ngc3 ngc3

MOHAWK FREAK

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 411
Re: Mohawk should apologize
« Reply #41 on: December 31, 2024, 09:22:38 AM »
    Someone out there has to know how to get my message to Randy.  I have winners and won’t wager.  Come on Randy I need my apology!!!!

 

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • Trigger: Never yours Master , your wisdom is priceless.  :)
    Today at 01:58:39 PM
  • Calhoun: Trigger, remember what they say about free advise. It's worth exactly what you pay for it.
    Today at 12:18:06 PM
  • Trigger: Thank you for the advise LUCPARK, and Calhoun for adjusting my meds.  Starting tomorrow all grudges squashed, as promised.  I will not post anywhere other than the live action thread in the t-bred section for 1 month.  There or PM, for 1 month!
    September 10, 2025, 09:48:43 PM
  • Trigger: Charlie Kirk: "You should be allowed to say outrageous things" [link]
    September 10, 2025, 09:21:33 PM
  • Trigger: Live expectancy in the United States 1n 1900 was 47, today 78, why isn't it 200, why?  You damn well know why, divisiveness, selfishness, ego, evil.  You're not anything but a human being, don't forget that!
    September 10, 2025, 08:03:06 PM
  • Trigger: Losing streak is over!  Killed at Harrington.  Thank you Kirbys Ace, appreciation and gratitude for the challenge!  I love the people of Delaware!   tmbz1
    September 10, 2025, 05:15:20 PM
  • Trigger: Sorry Calhoun my eyes are too filled with tears to be accurate  ngc3
    September 10, 2025, 04:52:15 PM
  • Calhoun: I actually bet on a horse named Miss Wobbles today. Maybe the worst name possible for a race horse. I got what I deserved. Somebody, shoot me.
    September 10, 2025, 04:49:59 PM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal