0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I was wondering myself yesterday...there wasn't even an inquiry I believe....it looked to me he came in and caused the 4 to break
Didnt bet it, but just saw it on youtube. Adios elim. How does the 2 not get dqd for causing the 4 to break?
The rail is 7 5 6 3 2 4 coming to past the half and before the final turn.The 3 pulls off the rail. Now the rail is 7 5 6 2 4.The 2 is lagging about five lengths behind the 6.6 gets too far on top the 5 and makes a slight pull back, no effect on the 2.The 2 who is racing to close that five and diminishing length gap on the 6 overacts when he gets too close to the 6.The 2 pulls back and makes the 4 a breaking casualty.OMG it's a Burke Burke Burke $2 exacta ($59.40) and $2 triple ($493.00) and .20 sup 652 was 1 could be an all in betting $196.96.You're both correct #2 should of been tossed, the answer is BURKE. He owns them apparently so they're ssshhhh!
driver files an objection against burke. that could cause him to maybe not get drives from burke in the future. or burke can make it hard for him in the future some where along the line.kinda like the girl that was abused. why didnt she leave right away. she was scared of the reprecussion. its a real thing.burke has a strangle hold of the track/judges/drivers= industry. thats why i say its a monopoly. he basically controls things from a place he shouldnt have control from.
from the replay that is an immediate dq of the #2however the race was sponsored by the mickey burke family soooo, that was not happening
Incomprehensible there was not even an inquiry. You are correct, the answer is Burke.
The driver can file an objection...
interesting kennyhowever i am not really sure what that has to do with an interference call more relevant is that it was a burke horse