0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Did they stop taking bets from the CAW's? Friday was far less than $2 million, with some races under $100,000. And Saturday was $2.2 million. They previously had a long streak of 3 million-dollar nights.
if they stopped taking CAW action-their handle would be less than $1 million-i know that hurts many posters hereMohawk had the BC-but that only has a minimal impact on M1 racing
Obviously, outside of a t-bred track, special meet, etc.-----if we are talking harness tracks, typically you are going to see a major delta between on-track and online handle. Racetracks have been unsuccessful getting new customers/fans. Once the sport, industry, tracks, and more, gets cleaned up, reinvented, etc., the tracks have to do a better job doing that. Whether they do or they don't, they will have to change their business model to accommodate the differential between on-track and online handle. Tracks are starting to do that. The "new" Meadowlands is much smaller than the old one. The "new" Belmont will be much smaller than the old one. And so on.
IMHO, I don't think shrinking grandstands will help grow the sport. If you search your memory, you will realize most tracks had a publicity director that at least attempted to draw more fans to raceways with all sorts of gimmicks, That sort of thing doesn't exist today.I'm not saying gimmicks alone will help the situation, but perhaps smart gimmicks may help a little.I always thought racinos should come up with a gimmick involving the slots and racing, perhaps a free bet for so many slot points or free slot play for horse bets.Perhaps new racing customers can come from the slot people, but I agree they need to clean up the game first and seem at least somewhat honest.
About those non-existent gimmicks...