Author Topic: Bring Back A-1, B-2, C-3 Classifications  (Read 6711 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Fuguzzi

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3104
Re: Bring Back A-1, B-2, C-3 Classifications
« Reply #15 on: September 07, 2023, 12:32:54 PM »
Imagine if PJ was given this power at Saratoga  73cv.2
Defrank built....

Hambletonian46

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 359
Re: Bring Back A-1, B-2, C-3 Classifications
« Reply #16 on: September 08, 2023, 07:32:20 AM »
There were far far less oddds on horses under the old clsssification system then in the NWx$xStarts system. And for the most part it was fair. Of course you had folks trying to milk a connection by running second or third each week; it was always fun when a horse got bumped up without having won a race at the lower classification. And it did give al ot of power to the racing secretaries, which I am sure pissed off the horsemen. But it was a  lot more digestibkle for the less experienced fans than the current systems.

But the current NWx$xStarts is just a joke. It incentivizes horsemen to run out of the money in order to get a lower classification. It also does not account for purse level differences between tracks. And using the Trackmaster ratings...just ridiculous.

Less competitive racing may be good for the horsemen but it does not help the bettors and in the end the health of the industry. I made it out to the Meadowlands and Saratoge Tbreds this summer and as an old guy the thing that surprised me the most in comparison to the days of my mispent youth was the number of completely crap races filled with crap horses. These are two of what should be the premiere meets in the country and the quality of the betting product was not there. The Meadowlands especially, 30 years ago there seemed to be multiple good horses in each race, now it is like trying to decipher who is the least worst.

Fuguzzi

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3104
Re: Bring Back A-1, B-2, C-3 Classifications
« Reply #17 on: September 08, 2023, 09:06:22 AM »
There were far far less oddds on horses under the old clsssification system then in the NWx$xStarts system. And for the most part it was fair. Of course you had folks trying to milk a connection by running second or third each week; it was always fun when a horse got bumped up without having won a race at the lower classification. And it did give al ot of power to the racing secretaries, which I am sure pissed off the horsemen. But it was a  lot more digestibkle for the less experienced fans than the current systems.

But the current NWx$xStarts is just a joke. It incentivizes horsemen to run out of the money in order to get a lower classification. It also does not account for purse level differences between tracks. And using the Trackmaster ratings...just ridiculous.

Less competitive racing may be good for the horsemen but it does not help the bettors and in the end the health of the industry. I made it out to the Meadowlands and Saratoge Tbreds this summer and as an old guy the thing that surprised me the most in comparison to the days of my mispent youth was the number of completely crap races filled with crap horses. These are two of what should be the premiere meets in the country and the quality of the betting product was not there. The Meadowlands especially, 30 years ago there seemed to be multiple good horses in each race, now it is like trying to decipher who is the least worst.

Fuguzzi

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3104
Re: Bring Back A-1, B-2, C-3 Classifications
« Reply #18 on: September 08, 2023, 09:07:43 AM »
Fantastic post. perfect desription of the current failed system and why the old ABC was far better, for the bettor, especially. Good job, Hambo!

theokodjak26

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1162
Re: Bring Back A-1, B-2, C-3 Classifications
« Reply #19 on: September 08, 2023, 11:53:43 AM »
I agree with Fug. Hambo wrote a great position paper.

Fuguzzi

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3104
Re: Bring Back A-1, B-2, C-3 Classifications
« Reply #20 on: September 08, 2023, 11:58:55 AM »
 tmbz1
I agree with Fug. Hambo wrote a great position paper.
tmbz1 to my friend, Kodjak

 

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • Ignorance Is Bliss: He had lunch with him last week.
    Today at 10:25:44 AM
  • Lockedin with Pace: Hey "G"? Is Bob Bongiorno a great guy and who the hell is "we"?
    Today at 10:14:22 AM
  • Ignorance Is Bliss: Kew Gardens Weather Kew Gardens, New York City, New York  ·  As of 9:14 AM EDT
    Today at 09:24:22 AM
  • G: Mike Torcello and Bongiorno are a forced to be reckoned with. That's a lethal combination thankful we have them in the business they're great guys been around for years
    Today at 09:16:40 AM
  • Call Sign Merlin: In range
    August 09, 2026, 10:33:08 PM
  • Dingus: Although El Dorado of Ft Myers lists Joshua Lewis as the principal.
    August 09, 2026, 01:29:36 PM
  • Dingus: Thanks, Cal.  Not familiar with Russo, but the other 3 are well known for obvious reasons.
    August 09, 2026, 01:16:55 PM
  • Calhoun: Eldorado .. Ron Russo main guy. Also Bob Weinstein, Mike Torcello and Bongiorno.
    August 09, 2026, 12:41:39 PM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal