Author Topic: Enough BS about the post times  (Read 6946 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Liberty Bell

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1612
Re: Enough BS about the post times
« Reply #15 on: January 05, 2025, 01:18:20 PM »
Settlemoir claims they experimented with starting at post time either last year or the year before, actually they started 2 minutes past post time and the handle dropped substantially so they dropped it. If you drill it into the bettors heads you're going to start on time they will adjust quickly because nobody wants to get shut out.

Papillon

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2609
Re: Enough BS about the post times
« Reply #16 on: January 05, 2025, 01:32:48 PM »
Settlemoir claims they experimented with starting at post time either last year or the year before, actually they started 2 minutes past post time and the handle dropped substantially so they dropped it. If you drill it into the bettors heads you're going to start on time they will adjust quickly because nobody wants to get shut out.

The CAW handle could care less when the race starts and they are the biggest customers

they should run them on time as scheduled and as you say, the bettors will adjust when they realize what they are doing

Charlestown tbred same thin--zero minutes till post for 9 minutes, but at least is dependable

Gurals drag could be anywhere from 5-25 minutes

Grandstand Handicapper

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2715
  • Which wolf wins? The one you feed.
Re: Enough BS about the post times
« Reply #17 on: January 05, 2025, 03:37:59 PM »
I won't speak to the so called open windows, open pools, certain players being able to bet after the bell, etc.

Post time drag is a reality. It is not going away. The issue is why is it occuring. For legitimate reasons there are measures that can be taken. While I like the idea of the countdown clock, the question then becomes when, how is it going to be used, etc. It should be universal and consistent. There is a disproportionate amount of monies that hit the pool late and that will always impact the odds. Now, CAW's add an entire new dimension to everything. While people may understand how they work, generically, the economics they operate on (from both the track and the CAW's perspective, nobody really knows how profitable they are. Nobody really knows how much they are putting in play every day, every race. The conjecture becomes reality. There is no debate that CAW's can absolutely impact the pools, late odds, and drastic odd swings, it is still unknown how accurate their business model and profitability are. Post time drag is a reality, and CAW's exacerbate the entire landscape.

Pari-mutuel wagering needs a complete overhaul, revamping, etc. In the end, the solution is a consistent protocol, universally, to identify and enforce exactly when wagering stops and when the race starts, thus addressing both issues.

Parked

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2805
Re: Enough BS about the post times
« Reply #18 on: January 05, 2025, 03:58:31 PM »
Settlemoir claims they experimented with starting at post time either last year or the year before, actually they started 2 minutes past post time and the handle dropped substantially so they dropped it. If you drill it into the bettors heads you're going to start on time they will adjust quickly because nobody wants to get shut out.


👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

Papillon

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2609
Re: Enough BS about the post times
« Reply #19 on: January 05, 2025, 04:19:46 PM »
I won't speak to the so called open windows, open pools, certain players being able to bet after the bell, etc.

Post time drag is a reality. It is not going away. The issue is why is it occuring. For legitimate reasons there are measures that can be taken. While I like the idea of the countdown clock, the question then becomes when, how is it going to be used, etc. It should be universal and consistent. There is a disproportionate amount of monies that hit the pool late and that will always impact the odds. Now, CAW's add an entire new dimension to everything. While people may understand how they work, generically, the economics they operate on (from both the track and the CAW's perspective, nobody really knows how profitable they are. Nobody really knows how much they are putting in play every day, every race. The conjecture becomes reality. There is no debate that CAW's can absolutely impact the pools, late odds, and drastic odd swings, it is still unknown how accurate their business model and profitability are. Post time drag is a reality, and CAW's exacerbate the entire landscape.

Pari-mutuel wagering needs a complete overhaul, revamping, etc. In the end, the solution is a consistent protocol, universally, to identify and enforce exactly when wagering stops and when the race starts, thus addressing both issues.

the link that Bello started a thread on gave us plenty of examples of how much they are playing

one of the main reasons the ADWs want to leave it status quo is breakage

TVG, Twinspires and 1/ST combined make about $40mil a year profit on rounding down payoffs.
« Last Edit: January 05, 2025, 04:21:42 PM by Papillon »

Liberty Bell

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1612
Re: Enough BS about the post times
« Reply #20 on: January 05, 2025, 05:43:02 PM »
I won't speak to the so called open windows, open pools, certain players being able to bet after the bell, etc.

Post time drag is a reality. It is not going away. The issue is why is it occuring. For legitimate reasons there are measures that can be taken. While I like the idea of the countdown clock, the question then becomes when, how is it going to be used, etc. It should be universal and consistent. There is a disproportionate amount of monies that hit the pool late and that will always impact the odds. Now, CAW's add an entire new dimension to everything. While people may understand how they work, generically, the economics they operate on (from both the track and the CAW's perspective, nobody really knows how profitable they are. Nobody really knows how much they are putting in play every day, every race. The conjecture becomes reality. There is no debate that CAW's can absolutely impact the pools, late odds, and drastic odd swings, it is still unknown how accurate their business model and profitability are. Post time drag is a reality, and CAW's exacerbate the entire landscape.

Pari-mutuel wagering needs a complete overhaul, revamping, etc. In the end, the solution is a consistent protocol, universally, to identify and enforce exactly when wagering stops and when the race starts, thus addressing both issues.

Even though I can't stand it and think it's unnecessary, I realize the drag is here to stay, but what they are doing is dragging the drag. Stop bringing the horses out with zero minutes to post, have them score for 4 minutes, then start a countdown clock at 180 seconds like Meadowlands does. At least bring them out with 3 or 4 minutes to post instead so it doesn't seem as bad. Never had the drag in the old days at any track other than Northfield. I do not believe the drag helps handle at all even though Gural's puppet Settlemoir thinks it does. People are still going to bet the same amount, only later.
« Last Edit: January 05, 2025, 06:13:05 PM by gh2009 »

 

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • Ignorance Is Bliss: Calhoun is desperate. First his 15 year lie was busted. Now he says I hid behind a 75 year old man to take the hit? Interesting. There's actually a Livestream out there I did from home minutes after two cowards attacked Yarock over me. Calhoun also thinks Mr. Ed could speak.
    Today at 05:40:35 PM
  • Sweet: ScrapeTheShit!  ;D
    Today at 05:31:27 PM
  • Sweet: Define Chihuahua Cock  ngc3
    Today at 05:27:52 PM
  • darnoldrocks: Dougie, define humanely?
    Today at 05:20:20 PM
  • Lockedin with Pace: dougie---with some people if they know 5 positive things a person has done and one negative, they'll completely focus on the negative.
    Today at 05:18:35 PM
  • dougie: I will make another point if I may. There are multiple horse owners in this group. LUCPARK, rainman2, and so many others. many here are very successful owning horses. I and my partners were not. But I can't believe people who do well in the game and folks like me who didn't cant agree that the horses should be treated humanely. The history of Mike P. might be interesting to people. And folks on Plop might dislike him for a myriad of reasons. I know nothing about him but his advocacy. I think I can seperate the misdeeds everyone talks about from his desire to help these horses.
    Today at 05:14:54 PM
  • dougie: lumped into their misdeeds. Sorry, my typing is off today.
    Today at 04:58:08 PM
  • dougie: Calhoun, I am not surprised at anyone who doesn't share my opinion. Everyone has the right to their own point of view. As for whatever acts you mentioned=Ed that he might have committed, it should not draw away from his horses advocacy. Many folks have done lots of things wrong. But despite that, should the good things they do be li=jumped into their misdeeds? Is a person to be judgedf on their worst day or instinct? Like I mentioned before, I don't know of the man. But I have studied up on him. I cannot answer for the things you and others seem to know about him as a human being. But I will continue to support his efforts to make the treatment of horses more humane.
    Today at 04:57:14 PM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal