Author Topic: Bring Back A-1, B-2, C-3 Classifications  (Read 4038 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Fuguzzi

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3104
Re: Bring Back A-1, B-2, C-3 Classifications
« Reply #15 on: September 07, 2023, 12:32:54 PM »
Imagine if PJ was given this power at Saratoga  73cv.2
Defrank built....

Hambletonian46

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 348
Re: Bring Back A-1, B-2, C-3 Classifications
« Reply #16 on: September 08, 2023, 07:32:20 AM »
There were far far less oddds on horses under the old clsssification system then in the NWx$xStarts system. And for the most part it was fair. Of course you had folks trying to milk a connection by running second or third each week; it was always fun when a horse got bumped up without having won a race at the lower classification. And it did give al ot of power to the racing secretaries, which I am sure pissed off the horsemen. But it was a  lot more digestibkle for the less experienced fans than the current systems.

But the current NWx$xStarts is just a joke. It incentivizes horsemen to run out of the money in order to get a lower classification. It also does not account for purse level differences between tracks. And using the Trackmaster ratings...just ridiculous.

Less competitive racing may be good for the horsemen but it does not help the bettors and in the end the health of the industry. I made it out to the Meadowlands and Saratoge Tbreds this summer and as an old guy the thing that surprised me the most in comparison to the days of my mispent youth was the number of completely crap races filled with crap horses. These are two of what should be the premiere meets in the country and the quality of the betting product was not there. The Meadowlands especially, 30 years ago there seemed to be multiple good horses in each race, now it is like trying to decipher who is the least worst.

Fuguzzi

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3104
Re: Bring Back A-1, B-2, C-3 Classifications
« Reply #17 on: September 08, 2023, 09:06:22 AM »
There were far far less oddds on horses under the old clsssification system then in the NWx$xStarts system. And for the most part it was fair. Of course you had folks trying to milk a connection by running second or third each week; it was always fun when a horse got bumped up without having won a race at the lower classification. And it did give al ot of power to the racing secretaries, which I am sure pissed off the horsemen. But it was a  lot more digestibkle for the less experienced fans than the current systems.

But the current NWx$xStarts is just a joke. It incentivizes horsemen to run out of the money in order to get a lower classification. It also does not account for purse level differences between tracks. And using the Trackmaster ratings...just ridiculous.

Less competitive racing may be good for the horsemen but it does not help the bettors and in the end the health of the industry. I made it out to the Meadowlands and Saratoge Tbreds this summer and as an old guy the thing that surprised me the most in comparison to the days of my mispent youth was the number of completely crap races filled with crap horses. These are two of what should be the premiere meets in the country and the quality of the betting product was not there. The Meadowlands especially, 30 years ago there seemed to be multiple good horses in each race, now it is like trying to decipher who is the least worst.

Fuguzzi

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3104
Re: Bring Back A-1, B-2, C-3 Classifications
« Reply #18 on: September 08, 2023, 09:07:43 AM »
Fantastic post. perfect desription of the current failed system and why the old ABC was far better, for the bettor, especially. Good job, Hambo!

theokodjak26

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1151
Re: Bring Back A-1, B-2, C-3 Classifications
« Reply #19 on: September 08, 2023, 11:53:43 AM »
I agree with Fug. Hambo wrote a great position paper.

Fuguzzi

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3104
Re: Bring Back A-1, B-2, C-3 Classifications
« Reply #20 on: September 08, 2023, 11:58:55 AM »
 tmbz1
I agree with Fug. Hambo wrote a great position paper.
tmbz1 to my friend, Kodjak

 

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • Trigger: Top flight handicapping and heavy hitters in today's Mohawk thread.  Whip, Seen2much and SAW found a backup date when the BigM shut her hole tonight.  Thread is safe, I'm not posting, just in the audience tonight  ngc3
    January 30, 2026, 07:13:20 PM
  • Trigger: If it's true that more people than we would ever think, even high single digit low single digit trainers are drugging.  The horses will be very sick soon, it will be a drugging competition to out do.
    January 29, 2026, 04:12:35 PM
  • Looloo2: Mark ford
    January 29, 2026, 01:10:31 PM
  • Trigger: Horseplop Classified:  Seeking an intelligent propoganda MAGA weapon to replace weak ass owned bitch Darnoldrocks aka Chihuahua Cock Karen.  Skillsets include copy & pasting news, defending your stance, not being a busted out lying twat  ngc3
    January 29, 2026, 12:19:11 PM
  • Trigger: This shitty movie was made in 2009, probably that's why.
    January 29, 2026, 10:03:12 AM
  • Dingus: Why?  Was Roger Huston calling it?
    January 29, 2026, 08:24:32 AM
  • Trigger: If I ever want to torture someone, make them watch the last 5 minutes of this Dingus horror show!  ngc3  [link]
    January 29, 2026, 01:04:51 AM
  • Dingus: Harness racing movie that partially takes place at the Meadows was AMAZING RACER.
    January 29, 2026, 12:19:38 AM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal