General Category > Thoroughbred Racing
Aqueduct race 2
(1/1)
Superfecta:
Can someone explain why the 2nd place finisher was disqualified ?
He was declared a non starter. I thought I heard the announcer say he was interfered with at the start. So if he’s the victim of a foul then why take him down ?
The disqualification cut the field down to 4 runners and that canceled show wagering. The 3rd place horse had over $100,000 in show money. The refund saved the track whatever the show loss would be as well.
luker2453:
The horse was not disqualified, he was declared a non-starter because the assistant starter had a hold on him when the gate opened. The stewards had no choice to say that he was a non-starter. Got a tough trip, and still ran a nice race to finish ahead of the 1-9 shot who ran third. Tough break for the owner and anyone who bet the horse to place or in the gimmicks.
Papillon:
--- Quote from: Superfecta on October 17, 2024, 02:06:56 PM ---Can someone explain why the 2nd place finisher was disqualified ?
He was declared a non starter. I thought I heard the announcer say he was interfered with at the start. So if he’s the victim of a foul then why take him down ?
The disqualification cut the field down to 4 runners and that canceled show wagering. The 3rd place horse had over $100,000 in show money. The refund saved the track whatever the show loss would be as well.
--- End quote ---
The assistant starter was still holding the horse when the gate opened--he was declared a non starter because he did not receive a fair start
if he wins he is considered a starter--those are the New York rules
Navigation
[0] Message Index
Go to full version