Author Topic: Talk Dark Stranger will Destroy the Breed  (Read 7905 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

The Answer

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 370
Re: Talk Dark Stranger will Destroy the Breed
« Reply #30 on: August 26, 2025, 08:21:40 PM »
Tall Dark Stranger 2yr. old colt Ubrute blew by undefeated Brandon Blvd in the stretch at the Red Mile today -- 1:50.1 last quarter 25.3.

Burke at the Red Mile doesn’t count he’s racing on jet fuel while the rest are racing lowest octane available.

SDST2009

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 595
Re: Talk Dark Stranger will Destroy the Breed
« Reply #31 on: August 26, 2025, 09:49:19 PM »
Burke at the Red Mile doesn’t count he’s racing on jet fuel while the rest are racing lowest octane available.

Fair point, but Warrawee Ubeaut was a hell of a mare. She has every right to throw a good one regardless of sire or trainer.

IMO, this article about TDS is just noise. He still has good bloodlines, he was still a good horse. Plenty of sires before him were great on the track and nothings in the shed and the breed hasn't been destroyed by it.

SeattleSlew

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 605
Re: Talk Dark Stranger will Destroy the Breed
« Reply #32 on: August 27, 2025, 05:27:12 AM »
Until the later season big $$ races are decided and the stats tallied, TDS (the horse) is looking pretty decent; racking up better numbers than Captain Treacherous both in the wins and avg./start for 2 yo and I don't see anyone bemoaning Captain Treacherous as "destroying" the industry.  This is just claptrap clickbait IMHO.. You can check the ytd numbers yourself:

https://www.ustrotting.com/trackside/sire_stats/stats.cfm?type=earnings&gait=P&yr=2025&age=2

https://www.ustrotting.com/trackside/sire_stats/stats.cfm?type=avg&gait=P&yr=2025&age=2

Parked

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2763
Re: Talk Dark Stranger will Destroy the Breed
« Reply #33 on: August 27, 2025, 07:18:18 AM »
Bloodlines are just something nice for breeders and the upper 10% of owners to talk about.
About any horse that does very well on the track has bloodlines that can justify its success.   
I wonder how many breeders scoffed at the breeding of the Hambo winner.  ?

Kenny

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 605
Re: Talk Dark Stranger will Destroy the Breed
« Reply #34 on: August 27, 2025, 08:46:03 AM »
Until the later season big $$ races are decided and the stats tallied, TDS (the horse) is looking pretty decent; racking up better numbers than Captain Treacherous both in the wins and avg./start for 2 yo and I don't see anyone bemoaning Captain Treacherous as "destroying" the industry.  This is just claptrap clickbait IMHO.. You can check the ytd numbers yourself:

https://www.ustrotting.com/trackside/sire_stats/stats.cfm?type=earnings&gait=P&yr=2025&age=2

https://www.ustrotting.com/trackside/sire_stats/stats.cfm?type=avg&gait=P&yr=2025&age=2


12th is average earnings of two year olds with more starters than all but three.
16th in average earnings of three year olds. only one has more starters.

JIDGE

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 337
Re: Talk Dark Stranger will Destroy the Breed
« Reply #35 on: August 27, 2025, 11:45:48 AM »
Until the later season big $$ races are decided and the stats tallied, TDS (the horse) is looking pretty decent; racking up better numbers than Captain Treacherous both in the wins and avg./start for 2 yo and I don't see anyone bemoaning Captain Treacherous as "destroying" the industry.  This is just claptrap clickbait IMHO.. You can check the ytd numbers yourself:

https://www.ustrotting.com/trackside/sire_stats/stats.cfm?type=earnings&gait=P&yr=2025&age=2

https://www.ustrotting.com/trackside/sire_stats/stats.cfm?type=avg&gait=P&yr=2025&age=2

Very valid point. But are we witnessing the slow decent of Treacherous? He's yet to produce a legitimate siring son. His 2yr. old crop this year are overshadowed by Cattlewash, TDS, Stay Hungry, and Sweet Lou. Unless a champ pops out of the weeds his yearling numbers are sure to suffer.

Grandstand Handicapper

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2214
  • Which wolf wins? The one you feed.
Re: Talk Dark Stranger will Destroy the Breed
« Reply #36 on: August 28, 2025, 09:44:27 AM »
Destroy the breed huh? I don't know about that, LOL, but there is a downside to a stallion being too popular so to speak. I don't think that's going to happen with TDS, LOL. Is the "genetic bottlenecking" concept real? Absolutely. However, it doesn't happen to any substantial extent, because commercial breeders have far too much to lose. You can see it in one year, maybe the second, but breeders know much more and much sooner, so it doesn't happen much longer. I haven't seen this happen with any stallion who shifted or damaged the breeding pool in a detrimental way in the last 50 years. There are plenty of duds, but their impact is inconsequential. One example, and it didn't shift the breeding pool, was Niatross. However, some will say he positively impacted the breeding pool.

Kenny

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 605
Re: Talk Dark Stranger will Destroy the Breed
« Reply #37 on: August 28, 2025, 11:40:33 AM »
Very valid point. But are we witnessing the slow decent of Treacherous? He's yet to produce a legitimate siring son. His 2yr. old crop this year are overshadowed by Cattlewash, TDS, Stay Hungry, and Sweet Lou. Unless a champ pops out of the weeds his yearling numbers are sure to suffer.

I don not think TDS is doing as well as your other examples.  Cattlewash is cleaning up in Ontario but will that hold up in all of North America?

Brown jug

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3494
Re: Talk Dark Stranger will Destroy the Breed
« Reply #38 on: August 28, 2025, 12:29:03 PM »
lets wait until the end of the season and then determine what stallions are good /bad/indifferent
right now there is too much influence of sires stakes for some stallions and not for others

as for burke he could have a mule as the stallion and win stakes races

Lance

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 979
Re: Talk Dark Stranger will Destroy the Breed
« Reply #39 on: August 28, 2025, 02:24:47 PM »
I don not think TDS is doing as well as your other examples.  Cattlewash is cleaning up in Ontario but will that hold up in all of North America?

Yes, I think it will.  His fee will go up next year and book will be closed.

Oliver Clozoff

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 301
Re: Talk Dark Stranger will Destroy the Breed
« Reply #40 on: August 28, 2025, 03:45:48 PM »
Tall Dark Stranger’s Shadow: How One Stallion’s Early Record Risks Setting Standardbred Pacing Back

The hype cycle vs. the scorecard


Tall Dark Stranger (Bettor’s Delight—Precocious Beauty) was an electric racehorse and a 2020 U.S. Horse of the Year. No one disputes that. But the only measure that matters to the breed is what his foals do on the track and in the breeding shed. After the early crops hit the races, the scoreboard hasn’t matched the sales-ring hype: first American crop yearlings averaged over $80,000, with 27 selling for six figures, yet the initial waves of 2-year-old performers delivered only scattered highlights and few breakout headliners relative to the hype and the mare quality he saw. Harnesslink

In Australasia, where his oldest are just turning two, the returns have been similarly modest so far—handfuls of winners, not a takeover. Early snapshots aren’t destiny, but they matter when a stallion was priced and promoted as a generational sire. Empire Stallions

Even in North America, where the book sizes and mare quality were premium from the jump, the narrative has required careful marketing spin. A 2024 Kentucky Sire Stakes win by a filly like KARMA showed he can get a quality horse—but one or two bright spots don’t offset a broader pattern of ordinary results from extraordinary opportunities. Empire Stallions

The opportunity cost of blue-chip mares


The breed advances when the very best broodmares are mated to sires that lift the average—producing durable, fast, and sound stock that stand up to stakes calendars and long campaigns. Tall Dark Stranger received that privilege. He bred large books of elite mares in 2021–2023, producing big foal crops and eye-popping yearling averages. When that pipeline yields “nice” horses instead of consistently superior ones, the loss isn’t just financial—it’s genetic opportunity cost: those same mares could have gone to stallions with stronger strike rates for top-end performers. Harnesslink+1

The “blue-blood loser filly” problem

Here’s the uncomfortable downstream effect: fashion drives matings. Fillies by hot, high-priced sires out of royal mares are valuable on pedigree alone. If many of those fillies underperform on the track, they still head to the broodmare band on name recognition and family—dragging their modest athletic merit into the next generation. That’s how mediocrity compounds:
1.   Pedigree momentum keeps them in demand despite race records.
2.   Breeding inertia means they’ll be bred early and often.
3.   Selection bias preserves the wrong traits (speed flashes without durability; pedigree over constitution).
Multiply that by a few hundred mares across two or three crops and you’ve redirected thousands of matings over a decade toward average instead of excellent.

Early stats: less than the marketing promised


Public databases and farm blurbs tell part of the story. Hanover’s own page pitched Tall Dark Stranger as a top-10 three-year-old pacing sire by progeny earnings in 2025 as of June 11, which sounds impressive until you benchmark against expectations for a horse that got elite mares and elite numbers. Being “top-10” isn’t the point when you were sold as era-defining. The question is conversion rate: how many stakes horses, how many six-figure earners, how many true open-class prospects relative to book size and mare quality? (Those ratios—more than raw dollars—separate breed-shapers from passengers.) hanoverpa.com

Broader USTA sire tables show he’s competitive in money lists, but not running away from contemporaries who had lower books or less gilded opportunities. That gap between promise and production is exactly what “sets the breed back”: we paid the genetic premium and didn’t collect the genetic dividend. ustrotting.com+1

Why this matters for the next 10–15 years

•   Genetic bottlenecking. When one fashion sire hoovers up a big share of the best mares, the whole crop tilts toward his genotype. If his average runner is merely good, you’ve just flattened a generation’s ceiling.
•   Soundness and longevity. The breed needs horses that can race hard at two and still matter at five. If the typical foal isn’t robust (or if the sire’s get skew toward flash-in-the-pan 2-year-old speed without staying power), stakes calendars become more attritional, not more competitive.
•   Economics of false signals. Sales chase pedigrees. Trainers and owners chase sale-ring signals. If the signal is wrong (high price ≠ high performance), capital is misallocated, good mares get “parked” into mediocre outcomes, and programs misread what’s actually improving the athlete.

The uncomfortable fix: change breeder behavior

If you want to stop a slide before it starts, you don’t wait five crops. You correct course now:
1.   Mate on performance, not logo. Audit each mare’s nick outcomes and biomechanical fit with multiple sires—not just the fashionable one. Put performance ratios (stakes winners per starters; $100k earners per live foal) ahead of median yearling price.
2.   Penalize underperformance quickly. If a stallion’s first two racing crops underdeliver versus book quality, farms and syndicates should cut the fee, reduce the book, and allow market share to return to sires with better conversion.
3.   Protect the broodmare band. Don’t automatically retire underachieving fillies by brand-name sires into the broodmare pool at premium fees. Make them earn the right via durability and class, or cull ruthlessly.
4.   Diversify the gene pool. Use more outcross and proven “value” sires with high strike rates per opportunity. The breed gets better when more stallions get real shots and only the best rise.

“But he has winners…” — separating signal from noise

Every fashionable stallion will have winners and a few nice stakes horses. The question is relative to opportunity. Tall Dark Stranger’s supporters can point to stakes wins (e.g., KYSS) and money lists that keep him visible. That’s not the standard he was sold against. With the mare base and numbers he enjoyed, a true breed-lifter would be dominating the top end, not just holding a place on aggregate earnings lists. The early Australasian data—limited winners from a manageable starter pool—reinforces the theme: pleasant results, not paradigm-shifting. Empire Stallions+1

The long tail: how a single stallion can delay progress

Because he touched so many of the best mares in a short window, his genetic “echo” will ring through yearling sales and broodmare bands for a decade. If the echo is average, you’ve muted the breed’s progress: slower stakes miles at the margins, fewer iron horses, fewer true open performers—while pedigrees still look glossy on paper. That’s the definition of setting the breed back: using up the premium ingredients without elevating the recipe.

This an intelligent, lucid, well thought out post... no one cares.

Kenny

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 605
Re: Talk Dark Stranger will Destroy the Breed
« Reply #41 on: August 28, 2025, 05:35:19 PM »
Yes, I think it will.  His fee will go up next year and book will be closed.


The Cattlewash babies are racing other Cattlewash babies and some Bulldog babies. What happens when they have to race the grand circuit?

SDST2009

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 595
Re: Talk Dark Stranger will Destroy the Breed
« Reply #42 on: August 28, 2025, 08:19:11 PM »

The Cattlewash babies are racing other Cattlewash babies and some Bulldog babies. What happens when they have to race the grand circuit?

Well, and Bettors Delight is up there, though he is not having the best year himself.

Beau Jangles gives the impression he can compete on the Grand Circuit, but frankly I'm not sure it matters. Cattlewash has  proven he can dominate the provincial program, and they're probably only going to get better now as he will get better mares based on his performance as a sire up there.

I share Lance's opinion he will close early at a higher stud fee next year.

 

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • Kirby's Ace: Still waiting for the harness track at Delaware Park!
    Today at 05:45:57 PM
  • Trigger: No Mama Bartlett Shangri La show at the YR Pub tonight?  ;D
    Today at 03:09:02 PM
  • Equine Advocacy Alliance: Yeah, and when YR closes thye're building a harness track at Belmont.  ngc3 ngc3 ngc3
    Today at 02:21:22 PM
  • Trigger: This year's 2 day Harness BC Finals Handle was just shy of $8mil, upside down to the purses.  Last year's T-Bred BC Handle at Del Mar was just shy of $180mil.  Harness is thriving  11.wj LOL.  Fri & Sat Entries and Past Performances are now available. Good Luck!   ;D
    Today at 12:06:59 PM
  • Trigger: Good Morning It's Post Time, there's nothing wrong with cordial formalities, is there fuckface?  Idabet got hit with a PA payment % and you and your endless monikers don't get your 5% rebates anymore, boo hoo  ngc3.  Carry on in stalking and berating me in T-Bred on repeat and forego the entire BC too.  Have a great week you big winner!   ngc3
    Today at 10:24:44 AM
  • It's Post Time: Only an asshole like you would spend the time trying to access people's posting history, unfortunately you took a wrong turn and are lost, now back to square one and try again!
    Today at 04:26:55 AM
  • It's Post Time: Your attempt at being a private eye is about as good as your handiucapping
    Today at 04:24:49 AM
  • Trigger: This fucking cunt, Maxx Bucknell, impersonates JT with a J T handle, then a fake he fakes Meadow Ford handle, ends with gh2009, now been back as It's Post Time stalking the live action wagering threads because he can't wager with Idabet.  I gave you my email address you sick fucking faggot stalker.  What are your afraid of other than everything!   ;D
    October 27, 2025, 11:38:58 PM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal