Nope. Don't have to. You prove people are guilty-----not innocent. I've been in this business for the better part of forty years. Doesn't mean a thing. But, from being in this business, I know that it is widely accepted, amongst people in the business and his peers, that Moore is an excellent horseman. Ask them if he's also a vet, and they will say yes, but without the raised eyebrow, scrutiny, inference, etc. If him being a vet makes him a cheater, I have one question. Are you saying he has access to "stuff" no other vet does?
People will yell and scream about Moore-----and others-----being dirty, being a drug trainer, using something illegal, and so on. They knock. I even see the haters take a minor infraction, a misdemeanor, and they make it into a major felony and they make the person out to be 100% dirty. Full blown cheater. They have to, it suits their argument. Good for them. But as soon as someone else comes up positive, and it happens to be a person they like or support comes up positive-----here comes the denial, deflection, rationalization, and so on. Very transparent to me. I am not arguing. Nothing more than MHO that he's an excellent horseman. And countless people actually in the industry agree. Doesn't mean that's right though. There's not always a right and wrong.
