Author Topic: wagering  (Read 590 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

andrew

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 428
wagering
« on: June 11, 2026, 05:34:16 PM »
this is just my thought on this
why box an exacta ?
way i look at it you for sure just wagered a loser [unless a dead heat].
myself have never box'd an exacta. i believe in my wager to run one two
yes it has cost me, but i cant get it out of mt mind one wager put in for sure is a loser

a trifecta i get it,, but knot an exacta

we all have our different styles and thats cool. if ya box em,, good luck. may the horse be with you
js

Sweet

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 9446
Re: wagering
« Reply #1 on: June 11, 2026, 05:49:31 PM »
Place is a smart bet.  tmbz1

JT

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2418
Re: wagering
« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2026, 07:53:07 PM »
Agree Andrew. I never box an exacta just for that reason  tmbz1
Tri's and Supers I key the winner on top and then spread

andrew

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 428
Re: wagering
« Reply #3 on: June 11, 2026, 07:59:34 PM »
Agree Andrew. I never box an exacta just for that reason  tmbz1
Tri's and Supers I key the winner on top and then spread
yep. we all have different styles but i never wanted to wager a for sure loser, i could always do that on my own  ngc3

pocketrocketwinner

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1329
Re: wagering
« Reply #4 on: June 11, 2026, 08:12:18 PM »
Boxing exacta is almost never good strategy. It can be ok if you toss the chalk entirely.

Betting to place is 99.99% of the time a horrendous decision. Brutally awful.

Kirby's Ace

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3882
Re: wagering
« Reply #5 on: Today at 12:02:26 PM »
You must of graduated from the SWEET school of handicapping if you think exacta boxes are stupid!

 tmbz1

Harness racer

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 4549
Re: wagering
« Reply #6 on: Today at 12:37:01 PM »
Boxes are how you hit huge.  I boxed 4 horses in a tri at Churchill Downs a few years ago.  Threw a 20-1 in there in case he hit the board.  Ended up winning with the betting fav out...paid almost $4k.  Biggest ticket I ever cashed.  Never would have put him on top...but the box paid off big.   tmbz1

pocketrocketwinner

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1329
Re: wagering
« Reply #7 on: Today at 01:53:33 PM »
You must of graduated from the SWEET school of handicapping if you think exacta boxes are stupid!

 tmbz1

An equally weight box (without presses) is illogical. That would mean that you have an equal opinion on every horse you used in the box. 99% of the time the horses you use in the box will have different odds. You would be infinitely better off in the long run if you removed the shorter priced horses out of your box and left the longer priced horses and doubled the base bet of the box. You cant be afraid of not cashing the ticket.
Hopefully I am not going way over your head. This is basic wagering theory.
Yes, equal weighted boxes are stupid

John Moody

  • Top Claimer
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
Re: wagering
« Reply #8 on: Today at 02:01:31 PM »
bridge jumping is the smartest bet one can make

Kirby's Ace

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3882
Re: wagering
« Reply #9 on: Today at 02:46:43 PM »
An equally weight box (without presses) is illogical. That would mean that you have an equal opinion on every horse you used in the box. 99% of the time the horses you use in the box will have different odds. You would be infinitely better off in the long run if you removed the shorter priced horses out of your box and left the longer priced horses and doubled the base bet of the box. You cant be afraid of not cashing the ticket.
Hopefully I am not going way over your head. This is basic wagering theory.
Yes, equal weighted boxes are stupid

Thank you Dr Spock!

 

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • Sweet: FATSO has no control over himself, you take the power away, his empowerment to do evil, then you're left with a nothing of a being.
    Today at 11:56:26 AM
  • Ignorance Is Bliss: Still a classic  ngc3 [link]
    Today at 11:46:57 AM
  • Ignorance Is Bliss: Pacer 2 find a new pharmacy yet?  ngc3. [link]
    Today at 11:38:05 AM
  • Sweet: Thankfully Mike is on the case, along with NYCLASS and other protestors.  When any side has no represenation, then they're screwed, because money and power rule of ethics i.e. the horse racing industry and how it cannot self sustain.  Pacer 2 and G are evil, nuts too!  tmbz1
    Today at 11:12:54 AM
  • dougie: IIB, I think the mayor will sign the bill if it reaches his desk. The optics on this issue is bad for the horse carriage industry. Animal activists are adept to using the media to enlist horror and anger by the public.
    Today at 10:56:32 AM
  • Ignorance Is Bliss: It's now a bill with city council. Public hearings will be scheduled then the council votes on it. If passed it's sent to the Mayor to sign into law. He has already said he's in. Marte just took over, Bob Holden is the actual author of the bill who retired last year.
    Today at 10:52:34 AM
  • dougie: IIB, I have been reading some of the work Councilman Marte has been doing on this issue. I think he might be successful with passing the 'Ryders Law" Bill this time around. The image of the horse dead on the street has even been seen here everywhere. If the animal activists can get this on the ballot, who knows how the vote will go.
    Today at 10:44:33 AM
  • Ignorance Is Bliss: You peaked at typing on Horseplop. Bravo. I was invited, that's Councilman Chris Marte next to me, good guy. [link]
    Today at 10:27:25 AM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal