Author Topic: Is this also a USTA rule?  (Read 946 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

firhill

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 429
Is this also a USTA rule?
« on: May 09, 2026, 12:44:07 PM »
I had no idea, and I still can't find it in the AGCO rules and regulations, but I just recently found out that the AGCO requires that every trainer must have a written contract between said owner and trainer for every horse.

Does USTA have this "rule" ?

Kirby's Ace

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3815
Re: Is this also a USTA rule?
« Reply #1 on: May 09, 2026, 01:01:49 PM »
No. Owners and lease horses need a contract though.

Never heard of that

 Might be something like that with certain trainers before they take your horses on a training bill.

firhill

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 429
Re: Is this also a USTA rule?
« Reply #2 on: May 09, 2026, 03:55:59 PM »
AGCO investigator demanded copies of all trainer's required contracts with his owners.
If it's mandatory, they should make a template available that would cover what they actually want to see. Like the claiming forms or ownership change forms that SC provide.

From here on out he should write on a napkin ......

"X promises to pay Y for training his horse"

Kirby's Ace

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3815
Re: Is this also a USTA rule?
« Reply #3 on: May 09, 2026, 04:29:08 PM »
I leased a couple horses when I first got in the business and only thing that was required was a statement stating the term and condition of the lease. Had to be given to Clerk Iof Course.
That was many years ago and maybe things changed

Stan durbread

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2244
Re: Is this also a USTA rule?
« Reply #4 on: Today at 11:49:48 AM »
I had no idea, and I still can't find it in the AGCO rules and regulations, but I just recently found out that the AGCO requires that every trainer must have a written contract between said owner and trainer for every horse.

Does USTA have this "rule" ?
That is the Anthony McDonald rule. It was put in place after he told an owner he amished their horse then changed the name and raced it for himself. Can’t remember if he got 6 months or a year but also big fine. A lot of trainers don’t think they need a contract with owners until they get screwed out of money.

Sweet

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 8683
Re: Is this also a USTA rule?
« Reply #5 on: Today at 11:53:08 AM »
That is the Anthony McDonald rule. It was put in place after he told an owner he amished their horse then changed the name and raced it for himself. Can’t remember if he got 6 months or a year but also big fine. A lot of trainers don’t think they need a contract with owners until they get screwed out of money.

That sounds like fraud at the felony level.

An integrity killer too.

Any more specifics, when, who (owner and horse), where?

Stan durbread

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2244
Re: Is this also a USTA rule?
« Reply #6 on: Today at 12:22:30 PM »
Owner was Terry Hunter. Can’t remember the horses names. But Terry happened to be looking at the program and saw that the age and pedigree matched the horse Antony said he Amished

Sweet

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 8683
Re: Is this also a USTA rule?
« Reply #7 on: Today at 12:32:53 PM »
Owner was Terry Hunter. Can’t remember the horses names. But Terry happened to be looking at the program and saw that the age and pedigree matched the horse Antony said he Amished

 tmbz1

Well done Stan, great memory on you!  tmbz1

17 yo case and very meaningful now too...a very inflated ego, narcissistic at times and self serving possibly all the time.  No one would accuse him and his operation not working their tails off but really for whom at whose bottom line.  Fractional ownership and the access he provides seem to supersede everything with his investors / fan club including and not limited he's often times not the best option to pilot their horses yet, he does.

https://standardbredcanada.ca/news/6-3-09/macdonalds-license-downgraded.html

Ramone

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 316
Re: Is this also a USTA rule?
« Reply #8 on: Today at 05:19:49 PM »
It gets even better. When his licence was downgraded to family only, he bought a horse from a girl who faced some financial issues. But true to form he didn't pay for the horse (it was a race out) and so ownership of Lil Orphan Cam wasn't transferred. Since Anthony couldn't train the horse himself, he put down Tyler Nostadt as trainer. All was well until Nostadt decided to leave and Anthony needed a new fall guy. He put down his brother James' close friend Johnny McKinnon as trainer. The horse promptly got a positive and McKinnon's career took a savage hit. Anthony said he would make it up to him. He didn't. Privately Anthony said it wasn't his fault because he got the stuff from Auciello and it was bad. Nice to throw yet another friend under the bus. Carmen was probably completely innocent so that part doesn't count for much except to show his pattern of always off-loading consequences.

 

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • Sweet: Kirby, you have my word tmbz1, for generations, my offspring here, Sweet Jr., Sweet III, Sweet VI... ngc3
    Today at 05:28:12 PM
  • Kirby's Ace: But atleast let us enjoy it for now
    Today at 04:18:25 PM
  • Kirby's Ace: We know this Sweet thing is not going to last
    Today at 04:17:34 PM
  • Sweet: Satan will give me $1mil cash, tax free to go back to being Trigger.  I resist!  ngc3
    Today at 03:32:29 PM
  • Calhoun: Kirby: 10-4 .. Copy that.
    Today at 03:16:30 PM
  • Sweet: Kirby's Ace Ventura, Plopper Detective... ;D
    Today at 11:49:21 AM
  • Kirby's Ace: Sorry Sweet you have to be in good standing for atleast a month before any advances. May I suggest a Title loan company
    Today at 11:30:54 AM
  • JT: Happy Mother's Day!!
    Today at 11:29:41 AM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal