0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
What you’re really saying is that nobody wants to bet on harness racing. I’m sure Indiana is no different from other states where the handle is far less than the purse money being paid out. So now you want to go ask for a handout?If harness racing can’t sustain itself, why should it be propped up with subsidies? Calling it a “fair share” from another industry is like asking for EBT cards to buy grain for your horses. It’s a joke when the purses are inflated but the betting numbers are embarrassing.
I would believe after 20+ years of operation, there is enough data to support facts. not ideas. Let's face facts, harness racing has only only flourished with live attendance and on track wagering. Both that have changed with the times. Technology is what advanced the product and technology is what has made the product close to obsolete. I don't care how much you spend on every form of advertising and marketing, you will never out seel, technology. Even the people who do come to the races beton their phone into pools that more favor them than the track.The notion that was floated was with big purses come big horses and fast times. Everyone will want to come to the track to see these races. Well , nobody gives a shit about the $10K claiming pacer that just won in 1:49 I don't know what the answer is or if there is an answer to the low attendance and poor live handle. But, what I do know is, it is not morse of the same thing.