0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
First, I don't think it's a matter of anyone at the USTA having the balls-----I think it's the intellect, the capability, capacity, etc.! Second, the USTA does not have the standing (or the credibility) to do this either. It will be a weak message, from a weak organization. Third, they simply are not a governing body. Plain and simple. When a person or organization, that doesn't have the standing, authority, or scope (vis a vis their authoritative purview) starts to insert themselves into controversial, fragile, difficult, etc., situations, when they take positions, make statement, tries to bring about change-----it makes matters worse.
two sentencescasino money harness racingno casino money no harness racing...
Why do you think casinos are at racetracks?Oh ya, the property is licensed for gaming.Seems like those casinos NEEDED the racetrack in order to get started.Places like WEG are simply landlords now, charging rent. They don't get a cut of casino action.