Author Topic: Harris, Pollock spent $2.5m more than the next biggest spender.....  (Read 6343 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

JL52

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 458
Re: Harris, Pollock spent $2.5m more than the next biggest spender.....
« Reply #15 on: October 09, 2024, 05:02:15 PM »
In my opinion, you're better off having an overnight horse who can race at Yonkers and run 30 times a year and win $100,000 or more. Training costs are expensive, and the high-profile ones charge more. Buying yearlings is a crapshoot and an expensive one. Andrew Harris did well when his stable was overnight horses , but it's totally different training and managing young horses, some trainers do well, others, not so well..
Agree with you, GH, re racing overnights at YR, but grossing 100k probably gives you just a 15k profit, and you have to get over the hurdles of being OK’d to race there, plus competing against all the druggies.

 

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • dougie: Yeah, They will wind up 10-7. And get knocked out early. Unless they upgrade a lot!
    Today at 09:05:42 PM
  • andrew: false start dougie  angbk
    Today at 08:39:24 PM
  • dougie: I knew my Chiefs would stink it up! LOL!
    Today at 08:27:05 PM
  • Dingus: I see Pocketrocketwinne r called out Pacer 2 today in the Eckley thread.
    Today at 06:59:44 PM
  • Trigger: Mike Mike Mike Mike Mike...Snot is like a duck in almost human form  ngc3
    Today at 06:56:07 PM
  • andrew: jessica, much more to  burn
    Today at 05:22:11 PM
  • G: Mike why are you pissing your welfare money away on football?
    Today at 05:07:13 PM
  • JT: I think KC vs Denver will be a close game..Good Luck!
    Today at 04:54:20 PM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal