LEGALLY, THE LIST ARE NOTHING MORE THAN DEFAMATION. UNTIL THERE IS SOMEONE WHO STATE EMPHATICALLY THAT THIS PERSON BOUGHT THIS SPECIFICALLY ON THIS DAY AND TIME--AND THAT SUBSTANCE IS ILLEGAL---THIS COULD BE A LIST FOR VALENTINES DAY!!!!!
THIS TRULY IS NOTHING. I HAVE NOT SEEN ANYONE STIPULATE IF ANYONE WILL IN FACT SPECIFICALLY STATE FACTS REGARDING ILLEGAL PURCHASES --IF IN FACT THEY ARE ILLEGAL.
IF A STATEMENT IS MADE, EVEN IF IT IS TRUE BUT USED IN A MALICIOUS WAY----THIS CAN BE DEFAMATION AND/OR SLANDER. THEREFORE, IN TODAYS LITIGIOUS SOCIETY EVERYONE MUST BE VERY CAREFUL ON WHAT THEY STATE IN WRITING OR VERBALLY AS THIS COULD BE CONSTRUED AS LIBEL/SLANDER.
PEOPLE CAN SUE FOR ANY REASON---THIS IS AMERICA. THEREFORE, MOST PUBLICATIONS ARE GOING TO BE VERY CAREFUL WITH THESE LISTS AND THE NAMES ON IT!!
THE INTERESTING COMMENT WAS THAT THE PROSECUTORS ARE IN DISCUSSION WITH SEVERAL REGARDING THEIR TESTIMONY TO HELP CONVICT. USUALLY, ONCE THE CASES ARE HEARD THE PROSECUTORS WILL EVALUATE HOW HELPFUL THE VARIOUS INFORMANTS WERE AND HOW INSTRUMENTAL THEY WERE IN OBTAINING THE GUILTY VERDICTS---THAT IS WHY THE FOLKS THAT ARE WITNESSES STILL DO NOT HAVE THEIR FINAL VERDICTS.
SEVERAL OF THE INFORMANTS HAVE BEEN RUMORED AS INFORMANTS IN PRIOR CASES AND THEREFORE THEY MAY HAVE BEEN INVOLVED IN THE INITIAL GATHERING OF INFORMATION AND DATA IN THE EARLY STAGES OF THIS CASE.
THIS IS FACT, THIS HAS HURT EVERY HORSEMAN AND IT IS VERY UNFORTUNATE THAT THE CASE EVER OCCURRED AS SO MANY WHO ARE HONEST AND RACE WILL BE HURT BY THESE VERDICTS.
