0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Ok question do you think all stock traders do it the old fashioned way? No technology advantage. Sorry that is the new normal. Only advantage you can have in horse racing is body language of the horse. Computer can稚 factor that in. Yet
No need for me to get involved. I知 not a degenerate that needs to bet every race. I watch lots and bet a few. Works for me. I laugh all the time about the complaints my 2/1 ended up at 4/5 those CAW bastards.
Don't ever say something you're not No one accused you Yet you need assurance Us normal people, don't use as pick up lines, I'm not a rapist, with that said I'd like to take you out for a nice time... But sure, if you felt it necessary to tell us all that you're not a degenerate, I for one believe you!
I知 a degenerate gambler, wanna bet on it ?
Well, now that this is out there and potentially being litigated.....the CAW's having the ability-----and the permission----to bet after the bell, will have to come out now.
This post make no sense as some of the most protected bank and crypto sites have been broken into including government places like the FBI and CIA and if you believe the racetrack will spend the money to protect gamblers your wrong as they cover up for drug cheats and every wrong you can instead of exposing it, The racetrack and horsemen could care less about our protection and no one has the ok to bet after the bell but ive seen cases of race refunds because the bell was not shut or ive seen races that the bell shuts off late and that should never happen,
Makes no sense? All I am saying is now that this is being litigated -- all the betting after the bell by the CAW's will come out now. Right? No, I am not talking about the BC incident. I am talking about the CAW's being able to bet after the bell. It's talked about on here all the time. It has to come out now, right or wrong?
not necessarilyproviding time stamp evidence would be incriminating themselves and I doubt that the two main tote systems controlling the North American pools would do thatthey probably categorize the bets made after the bell as "the last betting cycle" with no time stampthe latest Keeland exacta payoff is evidence enough that they bet after the bell --that people who bet before the bell don't play $400 cold exactas involving 40/1 shotsyes $400 cold exactas bet on "the last cycle" involving bombs come in all the time, legitimately
We dont know if that is the case and i cant make the opinion that is the case but it may be but the times i call and they check it they always say the bet was legit and thats like saying a huge drug trainer is legit because hes still training and the horse that faded last week is different because of the brilliant EQ changes but we know somethings wrong when nobody is winning, I thought you were making fun of a situation that is not funny to me , Those great trainers you know from blue bonnets days like Jacques Hebert and benoit cote and i know im going to get roasted for this one but yves fillion also would not be winning today if they did not cheat and they would be called as people that could not keep up with the times but you know the truth that something is wrong and we know the truth that race gambling can not be beat with what is happening and like the drug situation they may cover it up.
I am not making fun of anything. So, basically, just so I can understand, what you are both saying is that-----it's entirely possible that the CAW's betting after the bell-----may not come to light? It may not come out? It may not be proven? It may still be covered up?
