Author Topic: England not protecting pedos  (Read 33553 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Sweet

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 8757
Re: England not protecting pedos
« Reply #15 on: February 27, 2026, 09:12:14 AM »
I’d be interested in how this is resolved:


Them covering for him, lol they ALL GOT TO GO  ngc3 TO PRISON TOO  ngc3 and spend some time cohabitating with PEDOS.

This story says "minor", a minor can be 18 yo, 19-21 in some states. Need to know the age.

"Sexually abused" is a serious charge.

In some US states the age of consent is 16-18.

The age can enhance or lesson the charge, and this story omits it.

Then you have to prove it.

Words coming from Epstein's mouth not credible, no picture or video evidence which lawyers can claim doctored, no audio, then it like most of these cases come down to the victim, Witnesses and Means and Opportunity, more victims to enhance the Motive, i.e. being a serial pedophile, sexual assaulter.

Once upon a time everyone in a pre-school child care facility the kind that parents drop them off and pick them up after work were charged with dozens of counts of sexual abuse of children...turns out the whole thing was false, everyone exonerated...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McMartin_preschool_trial

"The case lasted seven years and cost $15 million, the longest and most expensive criminal case in the history of the United States legal system, and ultimately resulted in no convictions. The McMartin Preschool closed, and the building was ultimately demolished. In 2005, one of the children (as an adult) retracted the allegations of abuse."

« Last Edit: February 27, 2026, 09:14:13 AM by Trigger »

Foalin at 4

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 797
Re: England not protecting pedos
« Reply #16 on: February 27, 2026, 09:58:11 AM »
Them covering for him, lol they ALL GOT TO GO  ngc3 TO PRISON TOO  ngc3 and spend some time cohabitating with PEDOS.

This story says "minor", a minor can be 18 yo, 19-21 in some states. Need to know the age.

"Sexually abused" is a serious charge.

In some US states the age of consent is 16-18.

The age can enhance or lesson the charge, and this story omits it.

Then you have to prove it.

Words coming from Epstein's mouth not credible, no picture or video evidence which lawyers can claim doctored, no audio, then it like most of these cases come down to the victim, Witnesses and Means and Opportunity, more victims to enhance the Motive, i.e. being a serial pedophile, sexual assaulter.

Once upon a time everyone in a pre-school child care facility the kind that parents drop them off and pick them up after work were charged with dozens of counts of sexual abuse of children...turns out the whole thing was false, everyone exonerated...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McMartin_preschool_trial

"The case lasted seven years and cost $15 million, the longest and most expensive criminal case in the history of the United States legal system, and ultimately resulted in no convictions. The McMartin Preschool closed, and the building was ultimately demolished. In 2005, one of the children (as an adult) retracted the allegations of abuse."




Trigger, you certainly are the most qualified pedophile consultant on plop! When you are one, you know all the rules! ngc3 ngc3 ngc3

Sweet

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 8757
Re: England not protecting pedos
« Reply #17 on: February 27, 2026, 10:22:34 AM »

Trigger, you certainly are the most qualified pedophile consultant on plop! When you are one, you know all the rules! ngc3 ngc3 ngc3

You're the most tripped out Trump bottom feeder for consecutive months.

If you're calling me a pedophile then YOU are fantasizing about children getting fucked you asshole.

You think calling someone a pedo is a means of insult because you're a weak liar, standing up for the biggest weak liar actual pedophile.

I don't care what you call me, it's what people are that matters...and you bow down to an orange make up'd clown and you think his presidency bother us...I don't give a shit about POTUS or his whole fucking ugly thieving family.

And you and yours can drop dead!  ;D
« Last Edit: February 27, 2026, 11:51:20 AM by Trigger »

rainman2

  • Living Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 23206
Re: England not protecting pedos
« Reply #18 on: February 28, 2026, 12:50:02 AM »
You're the most tripped out Trump bottom feeder for consecutive months.

If you're calling me a pedophile then YOU are fantasizing about children getting fucked you asshole.

You think calling someone a pedo is a means of insult because you're a weak liar, standing up for the biggest weak liar actual pedophile.

I don't care what you call me, it's what people are that matters...and you bow down to an orange make up'd clown and you think his presidency bother us...I don't give a shit about POTUS or his whole fucking ugly thieving family.

And you and yours can drop dead!  ;D

WELL SAID!!!!    tmbz1 tmbz1 tmbz1 tmbz1 tmbz1 tmbz1 tmbz1

Sweet

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 8757
Re: England not protecting pedos
« Reply #19 on: February 28, 2026, 12:55:25 AM »
WELL SAID!!!!    tmbz1 tmbz1 tmbz1 tmbz1 tmbz1 tmbz1 tmbz1

Thank you BOSS!  hcx.1

Dingus

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1178
Re: England not protecting pedos
« Reply #20 on: February 28, 2026, 01:04:22 AM »
Thank you BOSS!  hcx.1

Ever notice that some folk like Foalin and Darnold never answer what-ifs concerning Trump?  They either don’t answer or deflect by trying to insult you.
For the record, I’m against any pedo no matter what party affiliation.

Sweet

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 8757
Re: England not protecting pedos
« Reply #21 on: February 28, 2026, 01:24:04 AM »
Ever notice that some folk like Foalin and Darnold never answer what-ifs concerning Trump?  They either don’t answer or deflect by trying to insult you.
For the record, I’m against any pedo no matter what party affiliation.

Foalin wants to inflict pain on dems, fails.

Darnold wants to convince everyone Trump's every move is outstanding, fails.

They fail because they're dumb.

One dimensional too.

When you have a sitting POTUS that has a majority in the other 2 branches of government, you don't need to say anything really.

They (more darnold) are responsible for spotlighting Trump's mishaps inadvertently, instead of doing minor damage control when Trump's administration fucks up in a major way.

Their latest behavior, they've both tapped out and just aiming to hate their executors which is easier than looking in the mirror at the cause of their failure  ngc3




darnoldrocks

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 937
Re: England not protecting pedos
« Reply #22 on: February 28, 2026, 08:14:43 AM »
Ever notice that some folk like Foalin and Darnold never answer what-ifs concerning Trump?  They either don’t answer or deflect by trying to insult you.
For the record, I’m against any pedo no matter what party affiliation.

Dingus, what haven't i answered?

If I've insulted anyone, it would be in response to the same!

rainman2

  • Living Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 23206
Re: England not protecting pedos
« Reply #23 on: February 28, 2026, 08:28:35 AM »
Dingus, what haven't i answered?

If I've insulted anyone, it would be in response to the same!

How many here have you insulted us a better question!!

We all agree to disagree here on plop from horses to politics and a few other things too. Welcome to 2026 and the world we live in!

FYI, I’m not going to take anyone’s crap here when they run their mouths because we agree to disagree!  Just how I operate! 

Don’t blame me because you and others cause your own problems here on plop! 

Dingus

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1178
Re: England not protecting pedos
« Reply #24 on: February 28, 2026, 01:49:49 PM »
Dingus, what haven't i answered?

If I've insulted anyone, it would be in response to the same!

On another thread several weeks ago I asked what the reaction would be if Trump was found in the Epstein files in a negative way.  Nobody answered.

Sweet

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 8757
Re: England not protecting pedos
« Reply #25 on: February 28, 2026, 02:11:04 PM »
On another thread several weeks ago I asked what the reaction would be if Trump was found in the Epstein files in a negative way.  Nobody answered.

IGGY reality.

Alternative reality for them.

Reality by omission.

Same heroes of theirs used to say that about FACTS.

Alternative facts.

Sick assholes  ngc3

darnoldrocks

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 937
Re: England not protecting pedos
« Reply #26 on: February 28, 2026, 06:39:11 PM »
On another thread several weeks ago I asked what the reaction would be if Trump was found in the Epstein files in a negative way.  Nobody answered.

Sorry, I don't follow every thread and every post like some do on here, but less than a month ago, before I put him on ignore, this was my answer to rainman2 to the same question:

1. I'll talk about the Epstein files when something substantive is provided.  Having your name mentioned means nothing.    As I have said before, if Trump is proven to be involved with minors, I'll be the first to call for his resignation or impeachment.

If you ask, I'll answer.   

Sweet

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 8757
Re: England not protecting pedos
« Reply #27 on: February 28, 2026, 06:51:55 PM »
Sorry, I don't follow every thread and every post like some do on here, but less than a month ago, before I put him on ignore, this was my answer to rainman2 to the same question:

1. I'll talk about the Epstein files when something substantive is provided.  Having your name mentioned means nothing.    As I have said before, if Trump is proven to be involved with minors, I'll be the first to call for his resignation or impeachment.

If you ask, I'll answer.

 11.wj

Brought to you by Chihuahua Cock  ngc3

rainman2

  • Living Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 23206
Re: England not protecting pedos
« Reply #28 on: March 02, 2026, 03:16:49 PM »
Sorry, I don't follow every thread and every post like some do on here, but less than a month ago, before I put him on ignore, this was my answer to rainman2 to the same question:

1. I'll talk about the Epstein files when something substantive is provided.  Having your name mentioned means nothing.    As I have said before, if Trump is proven to be involved with minors, I'll be the first to call for his resignation or impeachment.

If you ask, I'll answer.

When are they going to subpoena Melania?
Soon we hope! 
I believe she can’t decide to refuse a subpoena as she isn’t POTUS!
Maybe a qualified person-not darnokdrocks and foalin can substantiate this for plop!

rainman2

  • Living Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 23206
Re: England not protecting pedos
« Reply #29 on: March 11, 2026, 04:47:20 PM »
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1350068520496670&set=pcb.1350068573829998&__cft__[0]=AZZUhXitWH87ozrdaMc1HnWdm8XO7shvDEmPYihx8GT0EGy5HDas_wB_52d754kcKGn-yJg6Et83i36VoPDCrG8Wh6zvkvPUmBfThZWrXSXWimM_4d6VHr-T2em2AxtOfqfsbllprZa6v3Qokqm_ycRAlwqhm3MILiAyoAiS-8Pnl96JYuYOLiOHbnolwWUvibrZtjyjgSe42B9UqiqdNI2h&__tn__=*b0H-R

 

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • Sweet: If you love Mike, if you miss Mike and appreciate him, if you love to hate Mike, reach out to him directly...he hasn't posted in 9 days.  Whatever happened to being not nice in a very nice way, huh?  ngc3
    Today at 11:15:09 AM
  • G: Mikee you can bullshit these fucking losers but not me
    Today at 09:55:37 AM
  • G: What happened to the interview and phone call Mikeeee?
    Today at 09:55:17 AM
  • rainman2: Plop can read how STUPID/DUMB Andrew really is by TROLLING me after a few days of peace and quiet here!  Sorry plop, I didn't start it this time and he'll have to deal with me.  Sorry to potentially ruin plop for some here.  You go deal with Andrew over this!
    May 14, 2026, 10:48:43 PM
  • Sweet: Rainman2, that's a big screen name you swing around here...and you wear it well.  tmbz1  With that said, and you and Andrew geared up for another TC race, think Dewey Love as a nickname!  ;D
    May 14, 2026, 07:56:08 PM
  • rainman2: New differences of opinion starting with new individuals starting, old differences on plop returning!  Will there ever be peace here?  I’ve been good until Andrew started the trolling again!
    May 14, 2026, 06:37:18 PM
  • Sweet: Bumby, don't be mad at me.  At 1m 45s of this video, Frank Drucker's hair looks the same then, 1991, then it does now 35 years later in this Monticello interview tmbz1 at 1m 49s The Hair Club For Men commercial starts  ngc3 [link]
    May 13, 2026, 11:27:08 PM
  • Sweet: There very well might be a Twilight Zone spot happening on the backstretch at Scioto Downs, what the heck is happening that is spooking the hell out of the horses and making the drivers look like drunks  ngc3
    May 13, 2026, 08:17:59 PM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal