shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • dougie: I will make another point if I may. There are multiple horse owners in this group. LUCPARK, rainman2, and so many others. many here are very successful owning horses. I and my partners were not. But I can't believe people who do well in the game and folks like me who didn't cant agree that the horses should be treated humanely. The history of Mike P. might be interesting to people. And folks on Plop might dislike him for a myriad of reasons. I know nothing about him but his advocacy. I think I can seperate the misdeeds everyone talks about from his desire to help these horses.
    Today at 05:14:54 PM
  • dougie: lumped into their misdeeds. Sorry, my typing is off today.
    Today at 04:58:08 PM
  • dougie: Calhoun, I am not surprised at anyone who doesn't share my opinion. Everyone has the right to their own point of view. As for whatever acts you mentioned=Ed that he might have committed, it should not draw away from his horses advocacy. Many folks have done lots of things wrong. But despite that, should the good things they do be li=jumped into their misdeeds? Is a person to be judgedf on their worst day or instinct? Like I mentioned before, I don't know of the man. But I have studied up on him. I cannot answer for the things you and others seem to know about him as a human being. But I will continue to support his efforts to make the treatment of horses more humane.
    Today at 04:57:14 PM
  • Calhoun: Doug, Legit horse welfare advocacy is good. But your hero's current iteration is his 3rd such "alliance." You want to know why, DM me your email. You want to support the guy who baits working people into taking a swipe at him, good for you. You want to support the guy who steps behind a 75 yo man and lets that guy take a punch meant for him, go for it. You called me every name in the book, that;s ok. But your opinion is just that. But it's disingenuous to act surprised that others don't share your opinion.
    Today at 04:48:48 PM
  • dougie: I think that people should applaud anyone interested in the welfare of horses. Carriage or racing horses. To this day, I've never understood the venom spewed against a guy who seems to want to clean up racing. Some might question his motive for his advocacy. But why would anyone care if the result benefits the horses? If you attack the "messenger' in a cause, shouldn't the detractors have a valid reason why they attack him. Or is it only personable. I never met Mike. But I think his wanting to do the right thing is admirable.
    Today at 03:58:04 PM
  • Sweet: I don't agree one scintilla with you Harness Racer, you said the Misfits are giving us our own medicine, none of uws were ever antagonists, took shit for reasons, Mike bs from assholes who steal and hurt horses...your argument is the same a short skirt in the park deserved to get raped, anyway you said it, and inferred that  ngc3
    Today at 03:33:12 PM
  • wiggles44: Screenshots don’t lie :)
    Today at 03:29:53 PM
  • Lockedin with Pace: wiggles44, I think you have screenshot DS.
    Today at 03:11:16 PM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal