HORSEPLOP.COM
General Category => Harness Racing => Topic started by: Lar4400 on March 27, 2026, 06:54:12 PM
-
Late stretch he cuts off irvines horse 1 and not even a look by the judges. Am I missing something?
-
Yes, he had clearance and didn't interfere with the 1.
-
If Brad Irvine wanted to call an Objection he could of.
We don't see nearly enough of those in harness racing.
Maybe why he's a 10% pacer, 4% trotter winning driver.
Mohawk has that head on after multiple pan replays after the race, something BigM lacks showing the fans.
Whatever, if SAW says tmbz1
-
Just my opinion, I'd be interested if anyone thinks the different?
-
If Brad Irvine wanted to call an Objection he could of.
We don't see nearly enough of those in harness racing.
Maybe why he's a 10% pacer, 4% trotter winning driver.
Mohawk has that head on after multiple pan replays after the race, something BigM lacks showing the fans.
Whatever, if SAW says tmbz1
I believe Irvine is pals with the Bongs.
-
I believe Irvine is pals with the Bongs.
tmbz1
See... tmbz1
Just my opinion, I'd be interested if anyone thinks the different?
I watched it multiple times at the to the top the stretch and without that angle shot I couldn't tell.
Why he didn't want to hold the rail...
To avoid an accident, Joe B didn't give a shit when he left turned...but without seeing the head on, knowing Brad Irvine is a fucking idiot for not calling an Objection the way he jerked his bike to the right with tons of horse he is not upholding the integrity of the game for himself and his backers and connections.
You have more experience, maybe he could of stayed on the rail and he exaggerated, can't honestly tell if he was cut into...I defer to you - STILL ;D
-
Integrity, it does not seem to exist any longer in harness racing. What’s wrong with judges posting the inquiry lights for 1 minute to at least show the wagering public that there is still a shred of rules left and that someone is at least watching what we are. Come on already at least take a look.