HORSEPLOP.COM
General Category => Harness Racing => Topic started by: Oliver Clozoff on July 20, 2025, 11:43:50 PM
-
Didnt bet it, but just saw it on youtube. Adios elim. How does the 2 not get dqd for causing the 4 to break?
-
I was wondering myself yesterday...there wasn't even an inquiry I believe....it looked to me he came in and caused the 4 to break
-
I was wondering myself yesterday...there wasn't even an inquiry I believe....it looked to me he came in and caused the 4 to break
Didnt bet it, but just saw it on youtube. Adios elim. How does the 2 not get dqd for causing the 4 to break?
The rail is 7 5 6 3 2 4 coming to past the half and before the final turn.
The 3 pulls off the rail. Now the rail is 7 5 6 2 4.
The 2 is lagging about five lengths behind the 6.
6 gets too far on top the 5 and makes a slight pull back, no effect on the 2.
The 2 who is racing to close that five and diminishing length gap on the 6 overacts when he gets too close to the 6.
The 2 pulls back and makes the 4 a breaking casualty.
OMG it's a Burke Burke Burke $2 exacta ($59.40) and $2 triple ($493.00) and .20 sup 652 was 1 could be an all in betting $196.96.
You're both correct #2 should of been tossed, the answer is BURKE. He owns them apparently so they're ssshhhh! ;D
-
The rail is 7 5 6 3 2 4 coming to past the half and before the final turn.
The 3 pulls off the rail. Now the rail is 7 5 6 2 4.
The 2 is lagging about five lengths behind the 6.
6 gets too far on top the 5 and makes a slight pull back, no effect on the 2.
The 2 who is racing to close that five and diminishing length gap on the 6 overacts when he gets too close to the 6.
The 2 pulls back and makes the 4 a breaking casualty.
OMG it's a Burke Burke Burke $2 exacta ($59.40) and $2 triple ($493.00) and .20 sup 652 was 1 could be an all in betting $196.96.
You're both correct #2 should of been tossed, the answer is BURKE. He owns them apparently so they're ssshhhh! ;D
The driver can file an objection...
-
The rail is 7 5 6 3 2 4 coming to past the half and before the final turn.
The 3 pulls off the rail. Now the rail is 7 5 6 2 4.
The 2 is lagging about five lengths behind the 6.
6 gets too far on top the 5 and makes a slight pull back, no effect on the 2.
The 2 who is racing to close that five and diminishing length gap on the 6 overacts when he gets too close to the 6.
The 2 pulls back and makes the 4 a breaking casualty.
OMG it's a Burke Burke Burke $2 exacta ($59.40) and $2 triple ($493.00) and .20 sup 652 was 1 could be an all in betting $196.96.
You're both correct #2 should of been tossed, the answer is BURKE. He owns them apparently so they're ssshhhh! ;D
Incomprehensible there was not even an inquiry. You are correct, the answer is Burke.
-
driver files an objection against burke. that could cause him to maybe not get drives from burke in the future. or burke can make it hard for him in the future some where along the line.
kinda like the girl that was abused. why didnt she leave right away. she was scared of the reprecussion. its a real thing.
burke has a strangle hold of the track/judges/drivers= industry. thats why i say its a monopoly. he basically controls things from a place he shouldnt have control from.
-
driver files an objection against burke. that could cause him to maybe not get drives from burke in the future. or burke can make it hard for him in the future some where along the line.
kinda like the girl that was abused. why didnt she leave right away. she was scared of the reprecussion. its a real thing.
burke has a strangle hold of the track/judges/drivers= industry. thats why i say its a monopoly. he basically controls things from a place he shouldnt have control from.
Wasn't the driver of the 4 Palone? He is listed in every race sometimes on multiple horses. Burke doesn't like him anyway.
-
from the replay that is an immediate dq of the #2
however the race was sponsored by the mickey burke family soooo, that was not happening
-
from the replay that is an immediate dq of the #2
however the race was sponsored by the mickey burke family soooo, that was not happening
The judges are government employees. PA has gives $3.5 BILLION to racing. That continues because Hanover has a lobbying budget. The PA governor was the PA Attorney General.
https://www.pa.gov/form/governor/contact.html
-
interesting kenny
however i am not really sure what that has to do with an interference call
more relevant is that it was a burke horse
-
Incomprehensible there was not even an inquiry. You are correct, the answer is Burke.
The driver can file an objection...
They're cowards and cheats, and they running a side game on all of us that have an interest, involved horseman, gambler..
-
interesting kenny
however i am not really sure what that has to do with an interference call
more relevant is that it was a burke horse
More interesting is it is government corruption and the governor of PA is the former attorney general who has ambitions to be president. That same governor is whining about money yet says nothing about the $3.5 BILLION which has been handed to racing.
I gave you the form. Did you send a message?