HORSEPLOP.COM
General Category => Harness Racing => Topic started by: Atthetrack7 on July 11, 2020, 10:47:08 AM
-
WHO IS THAT RIDING THE POCKET?
https://twitter.com/JBRacingStable/status/1281947807205687298
-
WHO IS THAT RIDING THE POCKET?
https://twitter.com/JBRacingStable/status/1281947807205687298
Bigger question, is why aren't they wearing helmets ?
-
No one should be forced to wear a helmet, wear a seatbelt, or wear a mask. Im no fan of these chemists but i am also not a democrat.
-
Then make sure you are fully self-insured so, nobody has to suffer financially from your foolishness.
-
No one should be forced to wear a helmet, wear a seatbelt, or wear a mask. Im no fan of these chemists but i am also not a democrat.
Not sure if ur serious, but if you’ve ever had someone you care about severely hurt or died because of any of the examples you stated above you might not feel like that ..
-
Not sure if ur serious, but if you’ve ever had someone you care about severely hurt or died because of any of the examples you stated above you might not feel like that ..
My best friend drown, lets do something about water.
-
Waste of time, we all know she does NOT train. She is too busy on vacation and social media and following the white knight around
-
"Then make sure you are fully self-insured so, nobody has to suffer financially from your foolishness."
Exporter ... No doubt someone that isn't wearing a helmut could end up in intensive care from an accident, and it will cost someone plenty. And no doubt, someone not wearing their seatbelt could be thrown through the windshield, and it will cost someone plenty.
The trouble with that argument is, where does it end.
Someone who drinks too much alcohol and or eats too many donuts, will require more health care than someone who doesn't, and that will cost someone plenty. Should drinkers and donut eaters and fat people be required to be "fully self-insured" so nobody has to suffer financially from their foolishness?
-
"Then make sure you are fully self-insured so, nobody has to suffer financially from your foolishness."
Exporter ... No doubt someone that isn't wearing a helmut could end up in intensive care from an accident, and it will cost someone plenty. And no doubt, someone not wearing their seatbelt could be thrown through the windshield, and it will cost someone plenty.
The trouble with that argument is, where does it end.
Someone who drinks too much alcohol and or eats too many donuts, will require more health care than someone who doesn't, and that will cost someone plenty. Should drinkers and donut eaters and fat people be required to be "fully self-insured" so nobody has to suffer financially from their foolishness?
Democrats want to impose their bullshit on everyone.
-
"Then make sure you are fully self-insured so, nobody has to suffer financially from your foolishness."
Exporter ... No doubt someone that isn't wearing a helmut could end up in intensive care from an accident, and it will cost someone plenty. And no doubt, someone not wearing their seatbelt could be thrown through the windshield, and it will cost someone plenty.
The trouble with that argument is, where does it end.
Someone who drinks too much alcohol and or eats too many donuts, will require more health care than someone who doesn't, and that will cost someone plenty. Should drinkers and donut eaters and fat people be required to be "fully self-insured" so nobody has to suffer financially from their foolishness?
IM SELF INSURED...
I THINK JOE IS TOO
PRETTY OBVIOUS REASONS
-
No one should be forced to wear a helmet, wear a seatbelt, or wear a mask. Im no fan of these chemists but i am also not a democrat.
God Bless you,well said tmbz1
-
As a LICENSED FARM helmets are required on the track.
-
As a LICENSED FARM helmets are required on the track.
"Are you in good hands with Allstate?"
-
"Are you in good hands with Allstate?"
No, GEICO. Anybody jogging or especially training without a helmet are the biggest idiots out there. Doesn't take much to go down. Just my opinion.
-
"Then make sure you are fully self-insured so, nobody has to suffer financially from your foolishness."
Exporter ... No doubt someone that isn't wearing a helmut could end up in intensive care from an accident, and it will cost someone plenty. And no doubt, someone not wearing their seatbelt could be thrown through the windshield, and it will cost someone plenty.
The trouble with that argument is, where does it end.
Someone who drinks too much alcohol and or eats too many donuts, will require more health care than someone who doesn't, and that will cost someone plenty. Should drinkers and donut eaters and fat people be required to be "fully self-insured" so nobody has to suffer financially from their foolishness?
To some degree they are. Get a couple DWI's , you can't buy auto insurance. Until recently, pre-existing conditions would disqualify you from some health insurance.
I get your point. No matter how foolish and /or selfish your actions maybe everyone in our society will be provided health care.
-
No one should be forced to wear a helmet, wear a seatbelt, or wear a mask. Im no fan of these chemists but i am also not a democrat.
So you're just a retard!
-
the JJ bo team cant find the winners circle with out the EPO..... back to non factors... what does gurfien say? it obvious who the cheaters are... the numbers are OBVIOUS...
-
No, GEICO. Anybody jogging or especially training without a helmet are the biggest idiots out there. Doesn't take much to go down. Just my opinion.
And a good opinion it is. tmbz1